Calculating Mass Flow Rate of Steam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the mass flow rate of steam when 5% of heat is lost to the atmosphere, with a total flue gas flow of 1400 kmol/h. The inlet and outlet temperatures of the flue gases are 1832°C and 300°C, respectively, while the steam is produced at 5 barg and 159°C. Participants emphasize the necessity of knowing the specific heat capacity of the flue gases to accurately determine the heat transfer rate and mass flow of steam, suggesting the use of steam tables and enthalpy calculations for further analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic principles, specifically heat transfer.
  • Familiarity with steam tables and their application in thermal calculations.
  • Knowledge of specific heat capacities and enthalpy changes in gases.
  • Basic skills in chemical engineering calculations related to combustion and heat content.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific heat capacity of flue gases at varying temperatures.
  • Learn how to utilize steam tables for calculating heat transfer in thermal systems.
  • Explore enthalpy change calculations for gas mixtures using combustion data.
  • Study the principles of mass flow rate calculations in steam generation processes.
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineers, thermal system designers, and students studying thermodynamics who are involved in steam generation and heat transfer calculations.

sjh94
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If 5% of the heat available for steam production is lost to the
atmosphere, determine the amount of steam raised per hour when the
total flow of flue gases is 1400 kmol h-1.

qmH = 1400 kmol h-1

Flue gas temperatures:
Inlet = 1832°C
Outlet = 300°C

Water temperature:
Inlet = 90°C
Steam produced at 5 barg = 159°C

Latent Heat of Steam @ 5 barg = 2085 kJkg-1 (hfg)

Specific heat capacity of water = 4.18 kJ kg-1 k-1 (Cpc)

2. The attempt at a solution:

The specific heat capacity of the flue gas is not given, therefore I am missing 'cph' and cannot use the equation below:

upload_2017-1-10_12-1-16.png


If I could work out the heat transfer rate then I would be able to use the equation below to find the the mass flow of the steam??

upload_2017-1-10_12-4-31.png


Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello sjh, :welcome:

Seems to me the problem statement you were given is incomplete indeed. Otherwise your expressions are fine.
Perhaps there is a context ? Or else you are supposed to look it up somewhere and use an approximate value ? Somewhat strange, when the input temperature of the flue gas is given with such a high accuracy (on the other hand the 5% looks like a crude estimate) .
 
Thanks for the reply.

I should have mentioned that a previous question asked me to calculate the flame temperature, this is why the temperature is so precise.

I emailed my tutor with the following question:

'To my understanding I would require the specific heat capacity of the flue gases to use in this equation?

upload_2017-1-10_14-11-46.png


Is this correct? as the question doesn't state what the specific heat capacity is for the flue gas?'

His reply:

'That sounds sensible, yet as you mentioned the question doesn't state what the specific heat capacity is for the flue gases. So you need to think of other way to calculate the heat available, maybe you can use the steam table.'

Don't know if this helps further, thanks.
 
HI,
I'm afraid I don't see any inroads and the steam table doesn't help me for the process side.
@Chestermiller : am I overlooking something ?

BvU said:
Otherwise your expressions are fine

After reading a bit better: Note that
upload_2017-1-10_14-11-46-png.111347.png

is a bit deficient on the steam side: it only describes the phase transition; you also have to heat the water from 90°C to 159°C
 
BvU said:
HI,
I'm afraid I don't see any inroads and the steam table doesn't help me for the process side.
@Chestermiller : am I overlooking something ?
After reading a bit better: Note that
upload_2017-1-10_14-11-46-png.111347.png

is a bit deficient on the steam side: it only describes the phase transition; you also have to heat the water from 90°C to 159°C
This can't be done unless you know the composition or the heat capacity of the fluid gas. Is this the second part of a problem?
 
Hi,

Yes I have already calculated the flue gas composition, below is what I got:

upload_2017-1-10_14-48-32.png


There is 10% excess air provided in combustion, this is why I have a small amount of oxygen in flue gas.
 
Do your 'steam tables' also have properties for these gases ? As in Cengel, for instance ?
 
I have been provided with this table, which shows enthalpy of combustion gases.

I used these values when determining my flame temperature by calculating the heat content for each component = number of moles * enthalpy of component
Then added the heat content per combustion gas to give me my total

I calculated the total heat input per kmol of fuel to be 2349 kJ (maybe be right, maybe wrong).

I then used this value to determine my flame temperature, I started with a flame temperature of 1800°C which gave me a total heat content of 2305 kJ.

So I knew my flame temperature was higher, therefore I did the same with a flame temperature of 1900°C.
This gave me a heat content of 2448kJ which is higher than my calculated heat input of 2349 kJ. So my flame temperature was between 1800 and 1900, from these 2 results I produced a straight line graph and ended up with 1832°C.

Make sense?

The chart below should be kJ kmol-1 not MJ, I think.

upload_2017-1-10_15-2-17.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-1-10_15-1-27.png
    upload_2017-1-10_15-1-27.png
    23.9 KB · Views: 987
sjh94 said:
Hi,

Yes I have already calculated the flue gas composition, below is what I got:

View attachment 111351

There is 10% excess air provided in combustion, this is why I have a small amount of oxygen in flue gas.
So look up the heat capacities of these gases at the two extreme temperatures, and take their temperature average. Then take their molar average.
 
  • #10
sjh94 said:
I have been provided with this table, which shows enthalpy of combustion gases.

I used these values when determining my flame temperature by calculating the heat content for each component = number of moles * enthalpy of component
Then added the heat content per combustion gas to give me my total

I calculated the total heat input per kmol of fuel to be 2349 kJ (maybe be right, maybe wrong).

I then used this value to determine my flame temperature, I started with a flame temperature of 1800°C which gave me a total heat content of 2305 kJ.

So I knew my flame temperature was higher, therefore I did the same with a flame temperature of 1900°C.
This gave me a heat content of 2448kJ which is higher than my calculated heat input of 2349 kJ. So my flame temperature was between 1800 and 1900, from these 2 results I produced a straight line graph and ended up with 1832°C.
So forget what I said in my previous post. Get the enthalpy change per mole of the mixture between the inlet and outlet temperatures using this table.

Make sense?

The chart below should be kJ kmol-1 not MJ, I think.

View attachment 111354
 
  • #11
sjh94 said:
The specific heat capacity of the flue gas is not given, therefore I am missing 'cph'
So instead of ##c_p \Delta T## you use ##\Delta H## -- much better.

So much for answering your original post #1. The exercise is growing a bit bigger with your post #8 !

sjh94 said:
The chart below should be kJ kmol-1 not MJ, I think
You can compare with Cengel...
 
  • #12
May I just ask what delta H is, please?
 
  • #13
evoke1l1 said:
May I just ask what delta H is, please?
Enthalpy difference
 
  • Like
Likes evoke1l1
  • #14
Ahh I see! It makes sense to me now. Many thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K