Calculating Mass of an Astronaut in a Rocket with Two Accelerations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moninder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    F=ma
AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of the astronaut, the net force acting on him must be calculated using the equation FN - mg = ma, where FN is the normal force (scale reading), mg is the gravitational force, and a is the upward acceleration of 1.26 m/s². The gravitational force on the moon is 1.67 m/s², leading to the equation 188N - m(1.67) = m(1.26). Rearranging gives m = 188N / (1.67 + 1.26), resulting in the astronaut's mass. The discussion emphasizes applying Newton's second law and understanding the forces acting on the astronaut in a non-zero acceleration scenario.
Moninder
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An astronaut who is weighing himself inside of a rocket blasting off from the moon with an upward acceleration of 1.26m/s^2 records a scale reading of 188N . The acceleration due to gravity on the moon is 1.67m/s^2 .
Find the mass of the astronaut

Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I subtracted the accelerations to m=188N/(1.67-1.26) and it wasn't the answer, I also tried them individually and still can figure it out. m= 188N/1.67 and m=188N/1.26
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram for the astronaut. The astronaut has two vertical forces acting on him, the normal force FN upward (from the scale, which is also what the scale measures), and his weight Fg, downwards, which is the force with which the moon's gravity pulls on him.

Since the astronaut has a non-zero upward acceleration a = 1.26 m/s2, Newton's 2nd law says that there is a NET upward force acting on him. In other words, the sum of all vertical forces must be an upward force ma.

Fnet = ma

ƩF = ma

FN + Fg = ma

The gravitational force Fg is equal to -mg, with the negative sign because the force acts downwards. On the moon, g = 1.67 m/s2.

FN - mg = ma

Can you take it from here?
 
oooooo now i get it, thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top