Calculating Maximum Distributed Load on Beam Using Failure Theories

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum distributed load on a beam using failure theories, specifically von Mises and Tresca criteria. Participants explore the application of these theories in the context of a beam with specified dimensions and yield strength, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of beam failure under load.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on calculating principal stresses σ1 and σ2 for a beam under bending, using the equations related to maximum stress and yield strength.
  • Another participant suggests that if shear stresses are negligible, the principal stresses can be determined as the largest and second largest normal stresses.
  • A participant mentions that they have derived maximum stress from bending at the top or bottom of the beam, equating σ yield with σ x and noting σ y as zero, questioning the correctness of their approach.
  • One response agrees with the participant's findings, indicating that their reasoning sounds reasonable.
  • Another participant challenges the use of von Mises and Tresca criteria, stating that these are point failure criteria valid only for uniform stress distributions and suggesting that plastic theory should be applied instead.
  • A participant defends their approach by stating that the maximum moment at midspan leads to the greatest stress, asserting that their calculations are correct based on their checks of other points on the beam.
  • A later reply reiterates that the failure moment occurs when a plastic hinge develops, emphasizing that the beam retains strength beyond the yield point of the extreme fibers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of von Mises and Tresca failure theories to the problem at hand. While some agree with the initial calculations and reasoning, others argue for the necessity of considering plastic theory, indicating a lack of consensus on the appropriate failure criteria for the beam analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the assumptions regarding shear stress and the nature of stress distributions may impact the validity of the failure theories applied. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with concepts such as plastic analysis and the implications of different failure theories.

AdamX1980X
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Having a hard time with failure theories. Beam length 20 feet, 6"h x 4"w. sigma yield is 40 ksi. How to calculate the maximum distributed load the beam could carry using von Mises and Tresca failure theories. I have my shear and moment diagrams drawn and know they are right. I found that the max stress will be dead center due to bending. So sigma x= My/I . according to Tresca tmax = sigma yield/2. So how do I make it all relate to find my sigma1 and sigma 2 to plug into the failure theory equations. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Hi AdamX1980X, welcome to PF. So you're looking for the principal stresses σ1 and σ2? If your shear stresses are negligible (a common assumption with long beams), than these are just the largest and second largest normal stresses.

More generally, the principal stresses are the eigenvalues of the stress matrix. Or you can get them graphically from Mohr's circle, if you're familiar with that.
 


I have not covered the Eigen values of the stress matrix. I have covered Mohr's circle but I think I solved it conceptually. After drawing the shear and moment diagrams and calculating some equations I found the maximum stress to come from bending in the top or bottom of the beam. So sigma yield is sigma x which is sigma 1 I have a 0 value for sigma 2 which is sigma y. After using the stress equations I found that the yield is the same and the load is the same in both cases. Does this sound correct to you. I arrived at this from an example from the book.
 


Yes, this sounds reasonable.
 


I am not sure why you are doing this?

Von Mises and Tresca criteria are point failure criteria.
So they are only valid as failure criteria in structural elements for loadings that produce uniform stress distributions eg direct stresses.

The beam that you have described will not fail just because the extreme fibres have reached one of these criteria.

You need to use plastic theory for this.

go well
 
Last edited:


The reason why I did that is because the moment at the dead center of the bottom or the top is the greatest source of stress. I checked values for other points of the beam but this turned out to have the greatest stress. Indeed this was correct. Thanks for all the help.
 


The reason why I did that is because the moment at the dead center of the bottom or the top is the greatest source of stress. I checked values for other points of the beam but this turned out to have the greatest stress. Indeed this was correct. Thanks for all the help.

Perhaps you have not yet covered plastic analysis, but at failure of the beam your statement above is not true.

A beam such as you describe has considerable strength above the point where the midspan extreme fibres are stressed beyond their limits and yield.

The failure moment is called the full plastic moment and only occurs when a plastic hinge develops in a simply supported beam.
Other modes of support require more than one plastic hinge (failure section) to develop.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K