Calculating Minimum Plate Thickness

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around determining the minimum thickness of an aluminum plate subjected to a static load for a project involving load testing. Participants explore the relationship between plate thickness and maximum load without permanent deformation, considering material properties, support conditions, and stress calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a project involving a 5052 aluminum plate subjected to a static load of 2200 lbs and seeks an equation relating plate thickness to maximum load without deformation.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of specifying support conditions, such as whether the plate is fixed or simply supported, as this affects bending stresses and deformations.
  • A participant clarifies that the plate is bolted along the edges to a heavy aluminum structure, suggesting that the long edges can be considered fixed while the short edges may be free.
  • There is a suggestion to conservatively model the plate as a simply supported beam to calculate maximum moment and required section modulus for determining thickness.
  • One participant questions whether the problem is a homework question, which is denied by the original poster who asserts it is for a real project.
  • Another participant provides a formula for deflection under a point load, while also noting that stress calculations are necessary for this scenario.
  • Discussion includes inquiries about maximum stress values for materials and the importance of knowing material properties such as yield strength and ultimate strength.
  • Participants discuss the need to consider various failure parameters when determining plate thickness, including shear and bearing stresses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate modeling of the plate and the calculations required. There is no consensus on the exact approach to take or the specific values to use for material properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of plate tables or computer software for precise calculations, leading to reliance on conservative assumptions and simplified models. There is also mention of the need for specific material properties, which may vary based on alloy and heat treatment.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals involved in engineering design, materials science, or structural analysis may find this discussion relevant, particularly those working with load-bearing structures and material properties.

cntchds
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a project where I know that force will be applied by a bolt pulled through a hole in the center of an aluminum plate for load testing purposes (2200 lbs, actual worst case max force around 1500 with a 1.5 times safety factor), the dimensions (27"x6.25"x?), and the material (5052 Aluminum -- I thought about 6061 but I'm afraid it is probably too brittle).

We will be pulling on the plate with a static 2200 lbs for 1 minute for real world load testing. I was hoping to get an equation that related plate thickness to max load without permanent deformation. I would prefer to do the work myself(might come back for confirmation), but if needed I can provide more details! Thanks a lot for any help!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You first need to specify the support conditions of the plate...is it supported on all 4 sides along the edges...fixed or simple, ,,,or just at the ends, fixed or simple.
 
There are 14 bolts around the edges of the plate which affix it to a structure of very heavy aluminum. 7 (equidistance -- 4" apart) along each 27" side. I'm not sure what you mean by fixed vs simple. Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
A fixed edge support means that there is no plate rotation at that edge. A simply supported edge means that there is plate rotation at the edge. Plate bending stresses and deformations depend on the support conditions. With so many bolts along the long edges, you can probably consider the long edges fixed, and the short edges free, although in reality, the 'fixed' edge is not quite fully fixed . You would need a plate handbook or computer program to solve for these stresses and deformations. I don't have one handy.

EDIT: In the absence of plate tables or a computer software program, you can conservatively assume that the plate is a simply supported beam 4 inches wide by 6 inches long with a concentrated load at the center, calculate the max moment, and then the section modulus required, and find the plate thickness required. You can try this yourself if you are familar with stress/deflection beam equations. I know what thickness I would use, but if I tell you that, I'd have to put a disclaimer on it, for obvious reasons.

__________________
 
Last edited:
Isnt this a homework question?
 
Nope, this is a problem for an actual project I'm doing on the side.
 
PhanthomJay said:
EDIT: In the absence of plate tables or a computer software program, you can conservatively assume that the plate is a simply supported beam 4 inches wide by 6 inches long with a concentrated load at the center, calculate the max moment, and then the section modulus required, and find the plate thickness required. You can try this yourself if you are familar with stress/deflection beam equations. I know what thickness I would use, but if I tell you that, I'd have to put a disclaimer on it, for obvious reasons.

__________________

You have piqued my curiosity. Why are you using 4"x6" for the beam dimensions?

The equation I was looking at was

Deflection[meters]= ((Force[Newtons]*(Length[meters]/2))/(48 * Elastic Modulus[Newtons/Meter^2] * Moment of Inertia[meters^4])) * (2 Length[meters]^2)

Is this the correct equation for a single point load on a beam? I'm getting insanely small deflection (10^-8 m). I'm really not familiar with deflection of materials, so maybe this is correct? Thanks.
 
cntchds: Your formula in post 7 is correct for deflection. However, post 1 indicates you need stress, not deflection. The formula for stress on the beam in post 4 is, sigma = 1.5*P*L/(b*t^2), where b = beam width.

In post 4, PhanthomJay is giving you dimensions of an equivalent beam that will give you a stress close to the maximum stress on your given plate.

Here is an arbitrary example of the above stress formula. sigma = 1.5*P*L/(b*t^2) = 1.5(10 000 N)(152.4 mm)/[(101.6 mm)(7.20 mm)^2] = 434 MPa.

Here is an arbitrary example of your deflection formula. y = P*(L^3)/(48*E*I) = (10 000 N)[(152.4 mm)^3]/{48(69 000 MPa)[(1/12)(101.6 mm)(7.20 mm)^3]} = 3.38 mm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
In the case of the stress formula that you have provided is there a way to know the max stress possible with a given material? I can see that for any value of t as it goes up stress decreases exponentially, and the opposite as it decreases. There must be a point at which the material fails from being too thin.
 
  • #10
For a given material, maximum failure or yield stresses are a property of the molecular structure of the material. Steel for example will yield at somewhere between 30,000 to 100,000 psi depending on its chemical content and grade etc. Wood pine or fir species might fail at 8000 psi or so. These are axial or bending stress maximums. Shear failures occur at lower stresses. Concrete unreinforced might rupture at 4000 psi compression or just say less than 1000 psi in tension, depending on the mix (primarily water/cement ratio). These values are found in tables and often determined by testing. One would hesitate to come up with a plate thickness in your example without looking at all possible failure parameters. In nvn's example, you are looking at about 5/16 inch thick plate for the assumed max stress noted. But as I mentioned, check other factors...like punching shear or bearing stresses.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
cntchds said:
In the case of the stress formula you provided, is there a way to know the max stress possible with a given material?
Yes, I currently would say, probably use the tensile yield strength (Sty) for your material, instead of tensile ultimate strength (Stu). You will need to know the alloy name and number, including heat-treatment condition (or temper) number. What is the alloy name, number, and heat-treatment condition number, for your material? Do you have Stu and Sty for your specific material? E.g., for Al 5052-O (i.e., annealed), Stu and Sty might be Stu = 182 MPa, and Sty = 78 MPa (?). Is your plate at room temperature?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
143K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K