Calculating moments of intertia

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linus Pauling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intertia Moments
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moments of inertia for two particles with respect to different axes. For particle a, located at (3r, r, 0), the moments of inertia are derived as I_x = 1/3 * mr^3, I_y = 3mr^3, and I_z = 10/3 * mr^3, but there is confusion regarding the correct formula and units. The participants clarify that for point masses, the moment of inertia is calculated using I = m * r^2, simplifying the integration process. The second particle, b, is located at (r, -4r), and the total moment of inertia for both particles about the y-axis is debated, with calculations leading to a total of 10mr^2. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the formulas and understanding the geometry involved in moment of inertia calculations.
Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1. Find the moment of inertia I_x of particle a with respect to the x-axis (that is, if the x-axis is the axis of rotation), the moment of inertia I_y of particle a with respect to the y axis, and the moment of inertia I_z of particle a with respect to the z axis (the axis that passes through the origin perpendicular to both the x and y axes).

Particle a is located at x=3r, y=r, z=o



2. I = Integral(x^2 + y^2)



3. I_x = 1/3 * mr^3
I_y = 3mr^3
I_z = 10/3 * mr^3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Surely the formula is I = m*r^2 ?
so I_x = mr^2.
No integration needed when you have a point charge. The particle is a distance r from the x-axis. Your r^3 answers don't even have the right units.
 
Ah, ok thanks. Now I am supposed to consider a second particle, b, located at x=r and y=-4r, and calculate the total moment of inertia for the two particles of this system, with the y-axis as the axis of rotation.

Why 10mr^2 not the answer? I obtain this my summing I_ya + I_yb = 9mr^2 + mr^2
 
This is is driving me crazy :cry:
 
10mr^2 looks good to me, assuming the two particles have the same mass.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Moment of inertia (Perpendicular axis theorem)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Moment of inertia of a cuboid parallel to one of its faces (repost with diagram)
Replies
25
Views
2K
Rotational inertia of square about axis perpendicular to its plane
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
Moment of inertia of a disk about an axis not passing through its CoM
Replies
11
Views
3K
Correct Use of the Parallel Axis Theorem for Moment of Inertia
Replies
2
Views
2K
Calculate Principal Inertias - Exercise Hint
Replies
5
Views
1K
Calculating the Moment from a Different Vantage Point
Replies
4
Views
1K
Total moment of inertia of a two particle system
Replies
16
Views
69K
Parallel Axis Theorem Not Working
Replies
28
Views
1K
Two objects joined by a rectilinear cable rotating
Replies
8
Views
858

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top