Calculating Momentum of Propellant Gases in a Rifle Recoil

  • Thread starter Thread starter ooohffff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the momentum of propellant gases in a rifle's recoil, emphasizing the conservation of momentum principle. Participants clarify the initial conditions, noting that both the bullet and rifle start at rest, and the bullet's speed relative to the ground is derived by subtracting the rifle's recoil speed from the bullet's speed relative to the rifle. The conversation highlights the need to account for the momentum of the bullet, rifle, and exhaust gases collectively, ensuring the total momentum remains zero in a closed system. A common confusion arises regarding the sign of the momentum values, with suggestions to use the summation form of momentum equations for clarity. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
ooohffff
Messages
74
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The expanding gases that leave the muzzle of a rifle also contribute to the recoil. A .30 caliber bullet has mass 7.20×10−3kg and a speed of 601 m/s relative to the muzzle when fired from a rifle that has mass 3.10 kg . The loosely held rifle recoils at a speed of 1.95 m/s relative to the earth.

Find the momentum of the propellant gases in a coordinate system attached to the Earth as they leave the muzzle of the rifle.

I'm not totally sure how to set up the equations because I can't really visualize what the problem is asking?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



m1=.0072 kg
m2=3.1 kg
v1i= 0 m/s
v1f=601 m/s
v2i = ?
v2f=-1.95 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to apply momentum conservation here.From the perspective of the ground both the bullet and the rifle were initially at rest.Now after firing the relative velocity of the bullet is 601m/s relative to the rifle which has a relative velocity of 1.95m/s with respect to the ground.So what is the relative velocity of the bullet with respect to the ground?.Its (601-1.95)m/s.Now apply momentum conservation and see how much momentum is missing from one side.
 
  • Like
Likes ooohffff
ooohffff said:
I can't really visualize what the problem is asking?
It is saying that three things move as a result of the firing of the bullet:
  • The bullet
  • The gun
  • The exhaust gases from the explosive charge
Each of these has momentum. Since they form a closed system, the sum of their momenta is...?
 
  • Like
Likes ooohffff
Daymare said:
You need to apply momentum conservation here.From the perspective of the ground both the bullet and the rifle were initially at rest.Now after firing the relative velocity of the bullet is 601m/s relative to the rifle which has a relative velocity of 1.95m/s with respect to the ground.So what is the relative velocity of the bullet with respect to the ground?.Its (601-1.95)m/s.Now apply momentum conservation and see how much momentum is missing from one side.
I may be wrong, but I interpreted ooohfff's post as seeking clarification of the question rather than hints on how to solve it.
But maybe it's the relative velocity aspect that was the block.
 
Daymare said:
You need to apply momentum conservation here.From the perspective of the ground both the bullet and the rifle were initially at rest.Now after firing the relative velocity of the bullet is 601m/s relative to the rifle which has a relative velocity of 1.95m/s with respect to the ground.So what is the relative velocity of the bullet with respect to the ground?.Its (601-1.95)m/s.Now apply momentum conservation and see how much momentum is missing from one side.

Great, thanks...I forgot to subtract the 1.95 but fixed it. The other problem I have is that I get the right number for the missing momentum but I get the negative of it when it should be positive? I plug in mv=(.0072)(599.05)+(3.1)(-1.95)
 
ooohffff said:
mv=(.0072)(599.05)+(3.1)(-1.95)
It is easy to confuse yourself when writing balance equations that way. Safer is the form Σmivi=0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Back
Top