Calculating multiple magnitudes for induced electric field

AI Thread Summary
When two conducting loops of different sizes are placed in a uniform magnetic field and the field is rapidly decreased, both loops experience induced electromotive forces (EMFs) due to the change in magnetic flux, as described by Faraday's Law. The calculated induced EMFs for the loops are 416.26V and 66.6V, leading to electric field strengths of 13.25 V/m and 5.3 V/m, respectively. A key issue arises at the shared point of the loops, where two different electric field magnitudes cannot coexist. Additionally, the observation that induced electric field strength increases with loop radius contradicts the expectation of an inverse square law relationship. The confusion stems from the understanding that the electric field is not spatially uniform, but rather the curl of the electric field is uniform across the region.
Kerrigoth
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Let's say I place two different size conducting loops inside of a uniform magnetic field. For the sake of the diagram I have the loops share a point, but just treat them as though they are not touching.
Then I decrease the value of the magnetic field very quickly.
\frac{dB}{dt} = \frac{1.6T}{0.3s}=5.3 T/s
CRtLk8x.png

Since I changed the magnitude of the uniform magnetic field, the magnetic flux going through both loops will change. According to Faraday's Law, both loops will experience induced EMFs due to the change in magnetic flux. This will result in current.
\frac{d\Phi _{m}}{dt} = A \frac{dB}{dt} = \epsilon
\epsilon_{1} = \pi (5)^2 \cdot(5.3) = 416.26V \hspace{2cm}<br /> \epsilon_{2} = \pi (2)^2 \cdot(5.3) = 66.6V
Regardless of whether the loops are actually present or not, the changing magnetic field will create an induced electric field.
\epsilon = \oint E\cdot ds = E \cdot2\pi r \hspace{2cm}<br /> E=\frac{\epsilon}{2\pi r}

E_{1} =\frac{416.26}{2\pi (5)} = 13.25 V/m \hspace{2cm}<br /> E_{2} =\frac{66.6 }{2\pi (2)} = 5.3V/m

But the magnitudes of calculated electric fields are bugging me for two reasons:

1) At the "shared point", I have two different calculated values for the electric field. The electric field at a single point can't have two different magnitudes though! I must be doing something inherently wrong in this problem.

2) Judging by my two calculated electric fields: the strength of an induced field increases as the loop's radius increases. For some reason I keep telling myself that the electric field strength should decrease to satisfy some inverse square law. Is there a more intuitive way to look at this that could help overcome my bad instinct?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    7 KB · Views: 613
Physics news on Phys.org
Kerrigoth said:
Regardless of whether the loops are actually present or not, the changing magnetic field will create an induced electric field.
ϵ=∮E⋅ds=E⋅2πrE=ϵ2πr​
\epsilon = \oint E\cdot ds = E \cdot2\pi r \hspace{2cm} E=\frac{\epsilon}{2\pi r}
This is the mistake. E is not spatially uniform, the curl of E is spatially uniform.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top