Calculating Nagaoka's Coefficient for Inductors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fischer777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient
AI Thread Summary
Nagaoka's coefficient for inductors is not widely documented, leading to uncertainty about its calculation. It is suggested that for single-layer coils, the coefficient can be set to 1, yielding accurate results within a few degrees of error. However, there is a question about whether this coefficient should be computed independently for each inductor, especially when determining self-capacitance. Additional resources, including specific websites and Nagaoka's original paper, have been shared for further exploration. Understanding the application of Nagaoka's coefficient remains crucial for accurate inductor calculations.
Fischer777
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
I've tried searching the web, but so far I haven't run across any formula that states how to obtain Nagaoka's coefficient for an inductor. I have been told, however, that when working with single-layer coils the coefficient can be set to 1, and the calculation will still come out to be accurate within a few degrees of error. Is this true, or does Nagaoka's coefficient need to be computed independently for each inductor (I'm trying to find self-capacitance)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fischer777 said:
I've tried searching the web, but so far I haven't run across any formula that states how to obtain Nagaoka's coefficient for an inductor. I have been told, however, that when working with single-layer coils the coefficient can be set to 1, and the calculation will still come out to be accurate within a few degrees of error. Is this true, or does Nagaoka's coefficient need to be computed independently for each inductor (I'm trying to find self-capacitance)?

Have a look at these sites:

http://electronbunker.ca/CalcMethods.html

http://www.g3ynh.info/zdocs/magnetics/index.html

The last one even has Nagaoka's original paper.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top