Calculating Object Distance for Magnified Real and Virtual Images

  • Thread starter Thread starter iurod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Converging Lens
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating object distances for a lens to produce magnified real and virtual images, specifically focusing on a lens with a 50.0 mm focal length. Participants are exploring the relationships between object distance, image distance, and magnification.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the lens equation and magnification formula to find the object distance for both real and virtual images. There is discussion about the signs of image distance and magnification, particularly regarding the nature of real images being inverted.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the signs used in the equations, while others are questioning the assumptions made about magnification and its implications for the image orientation. There is ongoing exploration of the correct application of the lens equation, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies between their calculations and textbook answers, indicating potential misunderstandings of the relationships involved. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the signs associated with real and virtual images.

iurod
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a)How far from a 50.0-mm-focal-length lens must an object beplaced if its image is to be magnified 2.00 x and be real? (b)What if the image is to be virtual and magnified 2.00x?



Homework Equations


m = -di/do

1/do+ 1/di = 1/f



The Attempt at a Solution



m = -di/do solve for do
do = -di/2

Now i have to use the lens equation:
1/do+ 1/di = 1/f
-(2/di) + 1/di = 1/f
-1m/di = 1/f
di= -1m/(1/f)

di = (-1 x 2)/(1/50mm)
di = -100

This is what i got for part a, and I know it is totally wrong because to be a real image di>0 which is not what i got.

any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The real image is inverted, so the magnification is negative, -2. ehild
 
Is a real image upright or inverted? What does that tell you about m?

EDIT: oops, ehild beat me to it.
 
so for this part:
Now i have to use the lens equation:
1/do+ 1/di = 1/f
-(2/di) + 1/di = 1/f
-1m/di = 1/f
di= -1m/(1/f)

di = (-1 x 2)/(1/50mm)
di = -100

it should be:
di= -1m/(1/f)

di = (-1 x -2)/(1/50mm)
di = +100mm

so do = -di/m = -100/-2 = +50mm

in the back of the book it says the answer should be +75mm.
 
iurod said:
so for this part:
Now i have to use the lens equation:
1/do+ 1/di = 1/f
-(2/di) + 1/di = 1/f
You are still saying that do=-di/2. That will not be true, according to the help we gave you earlier.
 
A real image is inverted and m should be negative

m= -di/do
-2= -di/do
do= -di/-2

If this is correct then
1/do+ 1/di = 1/f
-2/-di + 1/di = 1/f
hmmm I'm stuck after this
 
Any more advice on this?

Thanks!
 
iurod said:
A real image is inverted and m should be negative

m= -di/do
-2= -di/do
do= -di/-2
Correct, but you can simplify "-di/-2"

If this is correct then
1/do+ 1/di = 1/f
-2/-di + 1/di = 1/f
hmmm I'm stuck after this
You are told what f is. Use that value, then you can solve the equation for di.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K