Calculating Overlapping Charges: A Chemist's Query

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the interaction energy between two overlapping charges represented by Gaussian distributions. The original poster seeks a method to integrate these charges without encountering issues at r=0 due to overlap. A clarification is made that the Gaussians represent regions where charge can be found, not point charges. The goal is to incorporate a repulsive component into a Madelung energy calculation to account for the finite size of ionic cores. The conversation emphasizes the need for a proper understanding of overlapping charge distributions in this context.
sphericalCat
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Another daft chemist question:

I'm looking at two charges spread over two overlapping Gaussians. I want the energy of the interaction, so, I take qq'/r and integrate first over one Gaussian then over the other... except for it all goes up the spout, because the charges are overlapping, and there are a lot of r=0.

There's got to be a really easy way round this, which doesn't involve disrupting the continuity of the Gaussians. What is it??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations you are using are probably for point charges, I'm not sure you can really speak of overlapping charges - overlapping fileds certainly.
 
sphericalCat said:
Another daft chemist question:

I'm looking at two charges spread over two overlapping Gaussians.
What do these Gaussians represent ? Are they the regions where charge can be found or are they charge distributions ? The former seems acceptable, the latter is quite unlikely. Anyhow, one cannot be talking about overlapping charges, so there must be something wrong in your understanding of the problem. Could you elaborate some more on the problem description, please ?

marlon
 
Sorry, sloppy language on my part. We are talking about regions where charge can be found.

What I basically am trying do is to add a repulsive component to a Madelung energy calculation, so I need something to represent ionic cores of finite size.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top