Calculating Percent Uncertainty for Volume of a Beach Ball

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the percent uncertainty in the volume of a spherical beach ball with a radius of 2.86 m and an uncertainty of 0.09 m, the volume formula V = 4/3 π r³ is used. The percent error in volume is three times the percent error in the radius due to the volume's dependence on the cube of the radius. The initial calculation of 0.09/2.86 provides the percent uncertainty in the radius, which is approximately 3.14%. Multiplying this by three results in a total percent uncertainty of 9%. Understanding this relationship simplifies the process of calculating uncertainties in physics problems.
Melissa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi, I'm attempting a physics problem... it is:
What, roughly, is the percent uncertainty in the volume of a spherical beach ball whose radius is r= 2.86 plus or minus 0.09 m.
Now, I tried to find the percent uncertainty by just doing .09/2.86, but I'm assuming I need to do something with the radius (in the way of changing it to the full volume...) before I can calculate this.
I know that to find the volume it would be 4/3 pi R cubed, but after that... how does the volume correlate to the .09? Does that need to be altered as well? I know the answer is 9% but I would like to actually understand how the question is done!
I'm just confused. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General Rule : When quantities multiply, the relative errors in those quantities add up.

The volume is proportional to the cube of the radius. As a result the percent error in volume is thrice the percent error in the radius.
 
ok... so since I cube the radius, I multiply the % error by 3...
ah. and that gives me 9%.
You are a genius. Why must physics profs supply us with pages and pages of calculations when you can solve a problem like THAT instead...
Thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top