Calculating Pipe Diameter for Desired Pressure in Inclined Fluid Flow

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the required pipe diameter for a 650m long PVC tube on a 1-degree incline, one must consider both friction and viscosity effects on water flow. The empirical formula for pressure drop must be adjusted to account for the incline and the length of the pipe, as these factors influence the flow rate and pressure at the outlet. The relationship between pressure drop, shear stress, and the friction factor is critical, with the pressure drop expressed as ΔP = (4L/D)τ. The friction factor is determined by the Reynolds Number, which incorporates fluid viscosity and flow velocity. Understanding these relationships is essential for accurately determining the necessary pipe diameter to achieve the desired pressure at the top end of the tube.
Mario Carcamo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The question:
There is a 650m long tube on a 1 degree incline. At one end of the tube is a pump that alone has a volumetric flow rate of 750 g/min. The fluid in question is water and its a PVC pipe. What diameter does this tube need to be in order to have 25 psi on the top end of the tube? (Water is at room temperature)

So far:
There is an empirical formula that is only an approximation but i realized that it can't be used in this situation cause the pipe is on an incline and its so long that the mass of the pumped out water will push down on the flow rate. How do you take into consideration friction and the water viscosity? Is this even possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the pump delivers constant head and flow and conditions are smooth no viscosity or friction then difference in pressure can be caused in homogeneous condition by varying pipe cross section thus varying kinetic energy density. Otherwise only losses will contribute to difference in pressure. With no loss, multiply with conversion 750 g with velocity and divide area A this gives pressure which is same as long as A is same.
 
Here's the thing... That's the flow without the pipping and inwant to take into account friction and viscosity
 
Is the question, "How do I determine the pressure-drop/flow-rate relationship for water flowing through a pipe?"
 
Yeah that's the question and with that relationship hopefully determine the diameter of the pipe
 
Mario Carcamo said:
Yeah that's the question and with that relationship hopefully determine the diameter of the pipe
The pressure drop is related to the shear stress at the wall τ by$$\Delta P=\frac{4L}{D}τ$$
The shear stress at the wall is related to the "friction factor" f by:$$τ=\frac{1}{2}\rho v^2f$$
In turbulent flow, the friction factor f is related to the "Reynolds Number" Re for the flow by:$$f=\frac{0.0791}{Re^{0.25}}$$
The Reynolds Number is given in terms of the viscosity μ by:$$Re=\frac{\rho vD}{\mu}$$
For more details, see Chapter 6 of Transport Phenomena by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top