Calculating Planetary Acceleration in the Solar System | Venus, Mercury Data

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of planets, specifically Venus and Mercury, using gravitational force and mass. A participant initially miscalculates Venus's acceleration due to an incorrect force value, leading to an unreasonably high result. Another participant suggests using the formula for centripetal acceleration, (v²)/R, to derive a more accurate acceleration after determining the planet's velocity. The correct gravitational force is calculated using the universal law of gravitation, yielding a more reasonable figure. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate input values and formulas in physics calculations.
aidan
Evening all.
My teacher has given us the mass, distance, and gravitational force of every planet in the solar system. we have to work out every planets acceleration, speed, and orbital period.
I'm having some trouble with the acceleration. This sshould be a very small number right?
I'm using the equation f=ma. (This is for Venus)
f=ma
a=f/m

f=1.12*10^34
m=4.89*10^24

now when i do f/m i get 2,290,388,548. Thats a huge number and I'm sure that Venus can't be accelerating that much.
My answer for Mercury was 0.0246 m/s.

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your value for f is way too high. How did you arrive at this number?
 
I think the formula you want for the acceleration is (v^2)/R where v is velocity and R is the radius of the planets orbit. Hope that helps.
 
Originally posted by S.P.P
I think the formula you want for the acceleration is (v^2)/R where v is velocity and R is the radius of the planets orbit. Hope that helps.

There's nothing wrong with his method, just the starting numbers.

For instance, with your method, he would first have to get the planet's velocity.

given that centripetal force = Mv²/r,

v= [squ] fr/M) =

(using the numbers given)

[squ](1.12 e34 * 1.082e11/4.89e24 = 1.57e 10 m/s

plug this into v²/r gives

(1.57e10)²/1.082e11 = 2286154928

Which is of the same order as the answer he already has.
 
i got f doing this:

f = G.m1.m2 / r^2

G = 6.67*10^-11
m1 = 1.99*10^30
m2 = 4.89*10^24
r = 1.08*10^11

which equals, = ...5.56*10^22

is this better??
 
Originally posted by aidan
i got f doing this:

f = G.m1.m2 / r^2

G = 6.67*10^-11
m1 = 1.99*10^30
m2 = 4.89*10^24
r = 1.08*10^11

which equals, = ...5.56*10^22

is this better??

Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top