Calculating Pond Evaporation: Is Floating Glass a Good Idea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peter2108
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pond
AI Thread Summary
Using a floating glass to measure pond evaporation is a viable method, as it can provide a clearer indication of water loss compared to the pond itself. The glass should be tethered and partially submerged to match the pond's temperature and wind conditions. Factors such as water plants and waterfalls can significantly influence evaporation rates, complicating the analysis. Conducting tests with the waterfall both on and off can help determine its impact on water levels. Overall, this approach can yield useful insights into the pond's evaporation dynamics.
peter2108
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a fish pond which may have a slight leak. Or not - maybe the water is just evaporating. Searching it seems there is not simple way to calculate how fast water will evaporate. So suppose I put a glass beside my pond and measure how far the level of water in the glass has fallen in - say - 24 hours. Say this is D mm. If it is only the surface area of the water that matters then presumably the pond should have fallen by D mm as well. Is this method likely to be successful?

@xts. Floating glass is a good idea - the po9nd is 3500 liters so its temperatuerew would vary much less than a glass, but floating glass should solve that. Will have to be tethered as there is a waterfall.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It should work. But I would recommend to put the glass partially sunk in your pond, to keep it in the same temperatura as a pond water has and in the same wind conditions.

ADDED>>>
If you have any water/swampy plants (e.g.canes) they may evapourate more water than pond surface. That may be really difficult to include in the analysis.
 
Last edited:
Assuming no leaks, a waterfall can be a noticeable contributor to evaporation I've found especially if it's wide enough and direct sunlight hits it. My brother's waterfall was made of 5 paving type slabs arranged in stairstep fashion and had direct sunlight on it.When I turned it off the water level reduced over time much more slowly...it was thoroughly checked for leaks and found to be ok beforehand. You could do two test periods , one with the waterfall on and another with it off and see if there is a significant difference but be mindful of humidity and rainfall variations over the test period.
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top