Calculating Potential Difference for a Bird on a Power Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference between a bird's feet while perched on a high-tension power line. The bird's feet are 3 cm apart, and the wire has a resistance of 80 μΩ/m with a current of 720 A. The resistivity is already factored in, simplifying the calculation. It is concluded that the bird will not be electrocuted because its potential is the same as the wire, resulting in no current flow. The calculation method involves multiplying the resistance per meter by the distance between the feet.
Wnt2bsleepin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A bird, whose feet are 3cm apart, perches on a bare "High tension" power line carrying a
current of 720A. If the wire has a resistance of 80μΩ/m, calculate the potential difference between the bird's feet. Do you think the bird will be electrocuted?




r = p * (L/A)



I have the problem set up as (8 * 10^-5Ω/m) * (.03m/A). I don't know what to put for the area since the cross section hasn't been given. I am aware that the bird should not be electrocuted since its potential is the same as the wire, so there should be no current.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wnt2bsleepin said:
A bird, whose feet are 3cm apart, perches on a bare "High tension" power line carrying a
current of 720A. If the wire has a resistance of 80μΩ/m, calculate the potential difference between the bird's feet. Do you think the bird will be electrocuted?

r = p * (L/A)
I have the problem set up as (8 * 10^-5Ω/m) * (.03m/A). I don't know what to put for the area since the cross section hasn't been given. I am aware that the bird should not be electrocuted since its potential is the same as the wire, so there should be no current.
Hi Wnt2bsleepin, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Note that the resistivity of the wire is given to you in units of Ohms per-meter. So the cross sectional area is already factored in.
 
Thanks, then all I have to do is multiply by the distance and I should get what I want.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top