Calculating Pressure on Tank Walls

  • Thread starter Thread starter banhbo_tt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Tank
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the pressure on aquarium tank walls, emphasizing that pressure at a given depth in a fluid depends solely on the fluid's density and depth, not the tank's width or length. The original poster notes that while the pressure formula p = d*h is valid, it does not account for the total force acting on the tank walls, which requires considering the area of the tank's surface. Several formulas related to pressure in liquids are mentioned, including p = dh and p = hpg, each applicable under different unit systems. The conversation concludes with clarification that the total force on the tank walls is determined by integrating pressure across the area of interest. Understanding these principles is crucial for ensuring the structural integrity of large aquarium tanks.
banhbo_tt
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

A problem pops up while I was trying to calculate the pressure impacts on my aquarium tank walls.

The first formula comes up to my mind was: p = d*h

where d is pressure at one point inside the liquid
d is density of the liquid (assume it's pure water)
h is the height or distance from that point to liquid's surface.

However, the formula DOES NOT take into account the WIDTH and LENGTH of the tank. To illustrate my problem, i make a comparison between my tank and a test tube.

Assume I want to build a aquarium tank (10 x 10 x 10 meters ) and a test tube with the same height 10 meters but with normal radius (about 1 cm) just like normal test tubes. Measurement system does not matter here, the importance is that they have the same height. So if I want to build a tank that's (10x10x10) I probably need to use 3-centimeter-thick-toughened glass in order to withstand the pressure created by that amount of water. However, with the 10 meters high test tube, I just could use a normal glass with much less thin (let's say 1-centimeter-thick is enough right?).

So my point is eventhough both have the same height but the aquarium tank requires much stronger glass, compared to the test tube does,to withstand the maximum capacity of water contained. Therefore, I believe the Width and Length ( or simply surface's area) should come in somewhere in the calculation.

Can anyone help me point out where i went wrong or what i have missed out?

Many thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure at any point in a static fluid depends only on the density of the fluid and the depth of the fluid above the point of interest. Remember, pressure has units of force / area.

However, if you want to calculate the total force acting on one end of the aquarium, then you must know something about the area of the end of the aquarium, or the side, or whatever. The force can be determined by integrating the pressure gradient over the area of interest of the aquarium.

In other words, the pressure at a depth of 10 meters does not differ whether the water is in a long thin tube or acting on a broad rectangular surface.
 
In fact, my house has a aquarium tank about (3 x 3 x 1 meters) = (H x L x W) made of 3 cm thick toughened glass. When water is pump in at 75% capacity, the side glass is clearly curved. I just could not believe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
banhbo_tt said:
so far I have found 3 formulas related to pressure in liquids:

p = dh

This is a formula for pressure as a function of depth when using a "gravitational" system of units such as the U.S. traditional system. In such a system the distinction between force and mass is blurred.

For instance, pressure (p) in pounds per square foot is the product of density (d) in pounds per cubic foot and height (h) in feet.

p = hpg

This is a formula for pressure as a function of depth using a "coherent" system of units such as SI where a distinction is made between your mass and the force required to support your weight.

For instance, pressure (p) in Pascals is the product of height (h) in meters, density (rho) in kilograms per cubic meter and gravity (g) in meters per second squared.http://00.edu-cdn.com/files/static/mcgrawhill-images/9780071393089/e0248-02.jpg

This is not a formula for "pressure". It is a formula for total force on the side of an aquarium in a gravitational system of units (note how the acceleration of gravity is not used).

The force F on the [vertical] side of an aquarium is given by the integral of the force on each horizontal strip from top (a) to bottom (b).

The force on each horizontal strip is given by the fluid pressure at the depth of that strip multiplied by the area of the strip.

The pressure at the depth of the strip is computed by the first formula above [pressure = height (h) times density (rho)].

The area of each strip is given by its width (w(h)) multiplied by its incremental height (dh).

The article in which this appeared was using height and width in feet, density in pounds per cubic foot and was computing total force in pounds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's clear now. Thanks you a a lot !
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top