Calculating Probability of Subsea Compressor System Failure

abba02
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Bolean Algebra

Question
The failure of a subsea compressor system is described by the following Boolean
Algebra statement:
F = A UBU(CUD)
If P[A] = 0.01; P = 0.0034; P[C] = 0.00067; P[D] = 0.002, calculate the probability
P[F] given independence between A,B,C,D.
ANSWER[0.013367]

ATTEMPTS AT PROBLEM
I have tried to use the associative expression to solve this but my answer is different from the given answer of .013367
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi abba02! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(btw, this probably ought to be in the coursework and homework section)

Show us your attempt, and then we'll know how to help you. :smile:

[And are you sure it's not F = A UBU(C∩D)?]
 
My attempts to solve the problem

It is F = AUBU(CUD)
I had derived the below using the associative law. But after plugging in the values of A,B,C and D , my answer were still different from the given answer.
P(A) +P(B) +P(CUD)-P[A]P-P[A]P[CUD]-PP[CUD]+P[A]PP[CUD]
 
Last edited:
… looks good to me …

Hi abba02! :smile:

Yes, your method looks good to me! :smile:

(though it would be quicker to say P(notF) = P(notA)P(notB)P(notCUD))

ok, now try it with f = A UBU(C∩D), and see what you get.
 
Thanks, With your advise, I have got the solution to the problem. I think that the problem must have been stated wrongly.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top