Calculating Projectile Height Using Law of Gravitation

  • Thread starter Thread starter majormaaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Law
AI Thread Summary
A projectile launched straight up at 8.1 km/s will rise to a height determined by the conversion of its kinetic energy into gravitational potential energy. The relevant equations include the gravitational force and potential energy formulas, with the key relationship being 1/2 mv² = GM/x². The discussion highlights the importance of correctly accounting for initial potential energy and the distance from the Earth's center. It clarifies that using mgΔh is inappropriate for this scenario due to the variable nature of gravitational acceleration at different heights. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating the projectile's maximum height.
majormaaz
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


At the Earth's surface a projectile is launched straight up at a speed of 8.1 km/s. To what height will it rise? Ignore air resistance and the rotation of the Earth.

Homework Equations


F = GMm/r2
Ug = -GM/r2
G = 6.67 e -11 whatever units it happens to be
That's all I'm 'given' for this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I figured that the kinetic energy that the rocket/thing starts off with converts into gravitational energy.
1/2 mv2 = GM/x2
where x is the distance between the centers of the rocket and the earth.
So that would mean x = r + h?
So if we rearrange terms to solve for x, we get:
x = ±2GM/v2 - r
However, that doesn't seem to work, either sign for the potential energy.
Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your initial equation should be

½v2= GM/x


But in any event, you did the rearranging correctly. Why doesn't it work?
 
majormaaz said:
1/2 mv2 = GM/x2
That's not right, but you seem to have (almost) used the correct version below.
where x is the distance between the centers of the rocket and the earth.
So that would mean x = r + h?
So if we rearrange terms to solve for x, we get:
x = ±2GM/v2 - r
Looks like you originally had x2, but when you corrected it you forgot to get rid of the ±. And you've left out the PE it started with.
 
1/2 mv2 = GM/x2
That's not right, but you seem to have (almost) used the correct version below.
Terribly sorry about that. I used the formula U = -GMm/x for that, where x still is what I defined it to be previously.

And you've left out the PE it started with.
So you're saying that the equation looks like:
1/2 mv2 + GMm/r = GMm/x ...? where r is the radius of the earth?
Let me try this out... looks promising.
But here's another question.

A long long time ago I learned that there was kinetic energy and potential energy, mgΔh. This type of potential energy is gravitational and so is GMm/r, so would the problem also be solved by replacing GMm/r with mgΔh?
 
majormaaz said:
A long long time ago I learned that there was kinetic energy and potential energy, mgΔh. This type of potential energy is gravitational and so is GMm/r, so would the problem also be solved by replacing GMm/r with mgΔh?
No, that's only valid for constant g.
 
haruspex said:
No, that's only valid for constant g.
aahhh... makes sense. It's similar to the reason why we don't use kinematics for equations with velocities accelerating at increasing/decreasing rates.
 
Got it. Thanks!
 
Back
Top