Calculating Properties of a Transverse Wave on a Rope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating properties of a transverse wave on a rope represented by the equation y(x, t) = (0.710 cm) cos π [(0.400 cm^-1)x + (500 s^-1)t]. Key properties to determine include amplitude, period, frequency, wavelength, and speed of propagation. The amplitude is identified as 0.710 cm, while frequency and period are derived from the angular velocity of 500 s^-1. Wavelength and speed of propagation can be calculated using the relationships between angular velocity and wave number. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct forms of wave equations to extract these properties effectively.
lordrrr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A transverse wave on a rope is given by the following equation.
y(x, t) = ( 0.710 cm ) cos pi [(0.400 cm^-1)x + (500 s^-1)t]

From this, find the amplitude, period, frequency, wavelength and the speed of propogation.

Homework Equations



Well, I know that v=f*lambda. I also know the general equation for sinusodal models in the -x direction:

y(x,t)= A*cos2pi[(x/lamda)+(t/period)]

(I choose to use this particular equation because it ties in with the one given to me)


The Attempt at a Solution



This problem is driving me nuts. I should be able to just take out the units that it aligns with and get that for the answer, right? I took out the 0.71, so I found the amplitude. I found the frequency by dividing 500 by 2. I found the period by dividing 1/250. But I can't for the life of me find the wavelength or the speed of propogation, can anyone please help? Thanks very much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone please help? I'm so lost.
 
The form y(x,t) = A cos (kx-wt) is more appropriate here...k is equal to 2PI/lambda and
w = vk. So your amplitude is given, period and frequency can be derived from the value given for angular velocity (w), wavelength derives from the value for k...and your speed of propagation is found using angular velocity (w) and wave number (k). Good Luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top