Calculating Relative Velocity and Length Contraction in Special Relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of Racer A from a spectator's perspective, given that Racer B is traveling at half the speed of light (c/2) and appears twice as long as Racer A. The length contraction formula is applied, leading to the conclusion that Racer A's length is half that of Racer B, resulting in a calculated speed of v = (√3/4)c for Racer A. Confusion arises regarding the necessity of Racer B's speed in the calculations, with participants clarifying that it is not needed for determining Racer A's speed. Ultimately, the relative velocity concept is introduced, suggesting that the final speed of Racer A can be derived by adjusting for Racer B's speed, leading to a proposed final speed of approximately 0.64c.
jlmccart03
Messages
175
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


The problem states: Racer A and Racer B have the same care length, but from a spectators view Racer A looks (1/2) that of Racer B. Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (c/2). I am to find the spedd of Racer A in the spectators frame of reference.

Homework Equations


Length contraction Δx = (Δx0/ϒ)

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was simply realize that the length of the car stays the same in both the z and y directions, but changes in the x direction. This means that I don't have to worry about the z and y direction lengths as they are equal and cancel. From there I took the length contraction equation and got ΔxA = (ΔxB/2). The jist of that equation comes from the fact that x*y*z = ((x/2)*y*z) and everything but the x's cancel. That resulting answer looks like the length contraction eqaution. From there I just solved for v from the fact that ϒ=√(1-(v^2/c^2)). My final answer is v=(√3/4)c.

Now where I am confused is the fact that I never used the information of the c/2 for racer B. Was that unnecessary information given or did I do something wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jlmccart03 said:

Homework Statement


The problem states: Racer A and Racer B have the same care length, but from a spectators view Racer A looks (1/2) that of Racer B. Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (2/c). I am to find the spedd of Racer A in the spectators frame of reference.
Is that an accurate statement of the problem? A velocity of ##\frac{2}{c}## does not make sense. No velocity makes any sense unless a frame of reference is specified.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Is that an accurate statement of the problem? A velocity of ##\frac{2}{c}## does not make sense. No velocity makes any sense unless a frame of reference is specified.
Sorry, edited it should be (c/2) not (2/c).
 
jlmccart03 said:
Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (2/c)
Check the units. 2/c is not a speed, it is the inverse of a speed

EDIT: OK, I see you caught that.
 
phinds said:
Check the units. 2/c is not a speed, it is the inverse of a speed

EDIT: OK, I see you caught that.
Yeah, I typed it up wrong. It should be c/2.
 
jlmccart03 said:

Homework Statement


The problem states: Racer A and Racer B have the same care length, but from a spectators view Racer A looks (1/2) that of Racer B. Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (c/2). I am to find the spedd of Racer A in the spectators frame of reference.

Homework Equations


Length contraction Δx = (Δx0/ϒ)

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was simply realize that the length of the car stays the same in both the z and y directions, but changes in the x direction. This means that I don't have to worry about the z and y direction lengths as they are equal and cancel. From there I took the length contraction equation and got ΔxA = (ΔxB/2). The jist of that equation comes from the fact that x*y*z = ((x/2)*y*z) and everything but the x's cancel. That resulting answer looks like the length contraction eqaution. From there I just solved for v from the fact that ϒ=√(1-(v^2/c^2)). My final answer is v=(√3/4)c.

Now where I am confused is the fact that I never used the information of the c/2 for racer B. Was that unnecessary information given or did I do something wrong?
Yes you are right, though racer B is traveling and A is stationary. But for B it's stationary itsself but A is traveling and no need to use the speed given as due to speed , length is contracted
 
Praveen mahajan said:
Yes you are right, though racer B is traveling and A is stationary. But for B it's stationary itsself but A is traveling and no need to use the speed given as due to speed , length is contracted
Wait, now I am even more confused. So the problem asks for the speed of Racer A from the spectators view. A and B are both racing each other, but from the spectators viewpoint A is half the length of B. B is traveling at half the speed of light. Since we are focused on the racer A and not B then we don't have to worry about the speed v = c/2? I'm sorry, I am just really lost on how to look at these frames and whatnot.
 
I hope if both are moving and in the same direction, then the concept of relative velocity is also need to adopt
Which is given as (v1-v2)/(1-v1v2/c^2)
 
Praveen mahajan said:
I hope if both are moving and in the same direction, then the concept of relative velocity is also need to adopt
Which is given as (v1-v2)/(1-v1v2/c^2)
So I have to take my 0.84c value and subtract it from the c/2 value? Or is that prior to finding my speed value of car A?

EDIT: According to your previous statement I took the values of v1=√(3/4)c and v2 = c/2. Using that equation I got a totale v = 0.64c. Would that sound correct?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top