Calculating Relative Velocity: Train vs. Car Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving relative velocity between a train and a car approaching a railway crossing. The train is moving northeast at 100 km/h, while the car is traveling west at 80 km/h, with specific distances to the crossing provided. Participants emphasize the importance of showing attempts at solving the problem to receive guidance, adhering to forum guidelines. Key calculations include determining the car's velocity relative to the train, predicting collision outcomes, and assessing required acceleration for a collision. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in problem-solving approaches to facilitate effective assistance.
kidgt23
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person on a train watches a car approaching a railway crossing ahead on his track. It appears that the car’s driver has fallen asleep and will not slow down. The train is traveling north‐east at 100km/h while the car is going west at 80km/h. The train is 4 km and the car is 3km from the crossing. I) What is the velocity of the car relative to the train. Pick the train travel direction (North‐ East) as the +x direction and the perpendicular direction (North‐west) as the +y direction II) Where will the train be when the car gets to the crossing, will they collide? III) Find the acceleration of the car required to cause a collision. IV) In the reference frame of the train rider, what is the acceleration.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kid, :welcome:

Is there a question here ? PF has a specific culture (read the guidelines) asking something from you ...
 
could u solve it
 
kidgt23 said:
could u solve it
In order to get help you need to show your best attempt to solve the problem and explain where you get stuck. We can just do the problem for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top