Calculating Resistance of a Non-Metallic Pencil Lead | 390 Ohm Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter qim
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resistance of a non-metallic pencil lead using the formula R = ρ x l / A, where ρ is resistivity, l is length, and A is cross-sectional area. The resistivity of the pencil lead is given as 4.0 x 10^-3 m, with a length of 0.15 m and a diameter of 1.40 x 10^-3 m, leading to a calculated resistance of 390 Ohm. Some participants question whether the equation applies only to resistance wire, but it is clarified that the formula is valid regardless of the material type. Concerns about the uniformity of resistors and potential air pockets are raised, but these do not invalidate the calculation for this specific example. The conversation emphasizes the straightforward nature of the resistance calculation despite initial confusion.
qim
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have a question:

A pencil "lead" is made from non-metallic material which has a resistivity, at room temperature, of 4.0 x 10^-3 m.

A piece of this meterial has a length of 0.15 m and a diameter of 1.40 x 10^-3 m.

Show that the resitance of this specimen is 390 Ohm.

-----


Well I though of using R = rho x l / A

But then I read earlier that " by examining the dimensions of the resistor (assuming it is made from resistance wire instead of carbon as some are) we can also work out its resistance"

Does that mean that the question is a red herring, as the pencil lead is made from non metallic material?

Help...

Thanks

qim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Other than the units being wrong for resistivity (they should be ohmsxlength, not just length) there is no "red-herring". It is just a simple multiplication.

Njorl
 
Thanks Njorl

But what am I to make of the statement that the equation should only work for resistors made of resistance wire?

That's the bit I could not understand.

Thanks

qim
 
I'm just guessing here:

Is it possible that they're covering themselves to take into account that typical resistors aren't uniform on the inside? IIRC, some are (deliberately) packed with small pockets of air.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top