Calculating resistivity from relaxation time.

Click For Summary
To calculate the resistivity of copper using the provided data, the formula for conductivity, σ = (ne²τ)/m, can be applied, where n represents the density, e is the electrical charge, τ is the relaxation time, and m is the mass of the electron. The calculated resistivity of 1.6e-3 Ohm·m is questioned for accuracy. For determining the Hall coefficient and the magnetic field acting on copper, additional parameters like thickness, Hall voltage, and current are necessary. The molar mass is not included in the conductivity equation as it primarily focuses on charge carriers and their properties. Clarification on these calculations can help ensure accurate results.
solas99
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Given the following data on copper, how do i calculate the resistivity?

Relaxation time: 2.50e10-14s
Density: 8940Kgm-3
molar mass: 63.5g

is there an equation for it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the formula for the conductivity \sigma is given by

\sigma = \frac{ne^2 \tau}{m} where n is the density, e is the electrical charge, \tau is the relaxation time and m mass of the electron. From here you should be able to find the resistivity.
 
i did the calculation, i got: 1.6e-3 Ohmm is that correct, or am i missing something.
thanks for quick reply
 
If we used the same metal (copper) in hall probe to measure the magnetic field, how can i calculate the hall coeficient of copper and the magnetic field acting on copper.

thickness 100um
hall voltage 0.1uV
current 1.5 A
 
i am a bit confused, is there a reason why the molar mass isn't in the equation?
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K