Calculating Resultant Velocity with Vector Diagrams

AI Thread Summary
The resultant velocity from horizontal and vertical velocities is not always at a 45-degree angle; this occurs only when the magnitudes of both velocities are equal. To calculate the resultant velocity, the parallelogram rule is applied, which involves adding the vectors and using the Pythagorean theorem. The magnitude of the resultant velocity is determined by the formula: vertical velocity squared plus horizontal velocity squared equals resultant velocity squared. The angle from the vertical can be calculated using the tangent function, where the opposite side is the horizontal velocity and the adjacent side is the vertical velocity. Understanding the parallelogram rule is essential, as it simplifies the calculation when the vectors are perpendicular, forming a rectangle.
Gogsey
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Is the result of a horizontal velocity and a vertical velocity caluculated by a vertor diagram whereby the resultant velocity is at 45 degrees from the horizontal?

If not, is is something to do with angles, please explain!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope,45° will be opnly in the particular case in which the velocities will be equal in modulus...

Apply the "paralelogramme rule"...Add the vectors and use the pythagorean theorem and the (circular) trigonometrical functions...

Daniel.
 
Ok, thanks for the reply, but this doesn't help me to much.

The veloicties are directly along the vertical and horizontal axis.

Why is the paralleogram rule needed?
I get why you use pythogorean theorem(i think), and do you use the trig functions to calculate the eultant velocties angle from the vertical plane?

So you use pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude of the resultant velocity.

vertical V squared + horizontal V squared = resultant V squared

And the angle form the vertical is calculated by using the tan rule of opp over adj.(The values of the opp and adj being the horizontal and vertical velocities).
 
Last edited:
Exactly right.

You're still using the parallelogram rule. It's just in this case, with the vectors being at right angles to each other, you happen to have a special case where your parellelogram happens to be a rectangle (this is the easiest case of the parellogram rule).
 
I see what you mean now. Since the velocities are both on the horizontal and vertical planes, and drawing in the other lines would give you the parallelogram, or in this case, a rectangle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top