Calculating Reynold's Number for an Infinite Plate | Understanding the Basics

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reynold's number
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the Reynolds number for flow over an infinite plate can involve different definitions for the characteristic length, typically represented as U L / ν. The choice of L can vary based on the specific application, with options including boundary layer thickness, momentum thickness, or the distance along the plate. This selection is somewhat arbitrary and should align with the governing equations relevant to the physics being studied. Normalizing these equations is crucial for accurate analysis. Ultimately, the approach depends on the specific problem being addressed.
member 428835
Hi PF!

Can you help me out with determining a Reynold's Number over an infinite plate? I know it to be ##U L / \nu## but ##L## isn't exactly defined. Would it be something more like ##U \delta / \nu## where ##\delta## is a vertical distance, say, the distance of the BL?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on your application. Boundary layer thickness is used sometimes. Momentum thickness is used sometimes. The distance along the plate is common. Sizes of small feature can be used if they exist. It just depends the problem at hand.
 
So is it arbitrary or is there a better thought process behind what is happening?
 
It is a little bit arbitrary. Really it's all about how the governing equations are normalized, and that all depends on the physics you hope to study.
 
boneh3ad said:
It is a little bit arbitrary. Really it's all about how the governing equations are normalized, and that all depends on the physics you hope to study.
I think by "normalized,", boneh3ad means "reduced to dimensionless form."

Chet
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top