Calculating RF Power: dBm-Volt-Watt Conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyclone24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Rf
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of RF power measurements from decibels (dBm) to voltage and watts, particularly in the context of measuring pulsed RF power using an oscilloscope. Participants explore the necessary calculations and considerations involved in these conversions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their setup involving an RF transmitter, attenuator, and oscilloscope, and seeks guidance on calculating power in watts from a measured voltage of 130 millivolts.
  • Another participant suggests ensuring a 50 ohm load for accurate voltage measurements.
  • A participant mentions using the formula P = V^2/R to calculate power in watts and notes that 0 dBm is referenced to 1 mW for conversions to dBm.
  • One participant calculates the RMS voltage from the peak-to-peak voltage and derives the power in microwatts, then attempts to relate this back to the actual power considering the attenuation.
  • Questions arise regarding the conversion from peak-to-peak voltage to RMS voltage, with clarification provided about the steps involved in the calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the formulas and methods for converting voltage to power, but there is some confusion regarding the specific calculations and the treatment of peak-to-peak voltage. The discussion includes clarifications but does not reach a consensus on all points.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the measurement setup and the characteristics of the RF signal are not fully detailed, which may affect the calculations. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the conversion process.

cyclone24
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have a basic question about the decibel -voltage - watt conversion.

I am calculating pulsed RF power on the scope. The setup involved an RF transmitter connected to one end of an attenuator. The other end is connected to the scope. Sure I used 100 dB attenuator first and decreased the attenuation from 100 dB to 60 dB (or applied 40 dB) until I see the RF peaks on the scope.

Now I measured the pk-pk RF wave on the scope and it is 130 millivolts. So from here how should I calculate the power in watts?

HInt: 60 dBm = 1000 watts; P = V^2/R; R = 50 ohms...?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the scope doesn't have a 50 ohm input impedance, you should terminate at a 50 ohm load and then measure voltage across it.
 
Thank you.

I already did that. So how do I convert the voltage value (in mV) in watts? Or how do I define the RF power here? guess I am putting it in a crude way...
 
Once you measure the rms voltage across the load, you can use this formula: P = V^2/R to calculate power in watts.

If you want that in dBm, note that 0 dBm is referenced to 1 mW

P_dbm = 10 log(base 10) (P/1mW)
 
Start with the voltage and convert it to RMS

So, that is (130 mV p-p / 2*√2) or 0.046 volts RMS

That is E ^ 2 / R or (0.046* 0.046 / 50) or 42.5 microwatts.

You have 60 dB of attenuation ( I think that's what you said).

So, 60 dB = 10 log ( actual power / 0.0000425)

actual power / 0.0000425 = 1000000

actual power = 42.5 watts
 
vk6kro and what, thank you for that explanation. It is now clear.

Just curious, Vrms is usually = Vpk/(sqrt(2)). Why did you divide by another 2 in the equation?

The RF here is a sinc wave.

Thanks
 
cyclone24 said:
Just curious, Vrms is usually = Vpk/(sqrt(2)). Why did you divide by another 2 in the equation?

Because initially you measured voltage in Vpp. To get it in Vp you have to divide it by two. Then you use Vp to convert to Vrms.
 
That was dumb. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K