Calculating RLC Circuit Damping Time and Energy Loss

AI Thread Summary
In a series RLC circuit, the discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for the current amplitude and energy to decrease to 50.9% of their initial values under weak damping conditions. For current amplitude, the correct approach involves using the exponential decay function e^(at), where 'a' is defined as -R/L. The initial misunderstanding stemmed from incorrectly applying the sine function instead of focusing on the exponential decay. The correct formula yields t = (1/R) * ln(1/0.509) for the time to reach 50.9% amplitude. Clarification emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the oscillation's maximum amplitude and the overall behavior of the circuit.
andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Electrical oscillations are initiated in a series circuit containing a capacitance C, inductance L, and resistance R.

a) If R << sqrt((4L)/C) (weak damping), how much time elapses before the amplitude of the current oscillation falls off to 50.9% of its initial value?

b) How long does it take the energy to decrease to 50.9% of its initial value?

For part A, since I = I(max) * sin(wt), I put I(max)*.509 = I(max) * sin(wt).
I(max) cancels out and you are left with .509 = sin(wt). I let w = 1/sqrt(LC). Next, I solved for t and came up with t = sqrt(LC)*arcsin(.509). It says the answer is wrong though. Any help would be great! thx! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you were not even answering what the question asked...
for a weak damping oscillation, the amplitude is e^(at)sin(bt) ... whereas a and b are constant...
the question is asking you when will the maximun amplitude i.e. e^(at) decrease to 50.9%, not the whole thing...
 
so you do .509 = e^(at) and solve for t, where a = -Rt/L?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top