Calculating Rotational Inertia for a Section of a Right Circular Cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational inertia of a section of a right circular cylinder with a specific radius and angle. The user initially applies the formula I=Integral(R^2*dm) and seeks confirmation on their approach. Participants suggest using cylindrical coordinates for the calculation and provide a modified integral expression to assist. The conversation highlights the need for further clarification and assistance in solving the inertia problem. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper coordinate systems in solving physics problems related to rotational inertia.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Please take a look at this:

Calculate the rotational inertia of a section of a right circular cylinder of radius R that subtends an angle of 'theta knot' at the origin when the reference axis is at the origin and perpendicular to the section.

I tried to draw the picture in the attachment.
I tried to use the formula I=Integral(R2*dm), with dm =density*dV
where V is the volume. I would like to know if I am in the good direction

Thank you for your help

B
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
brad sue said:
Calculate the rotational inertia of a section of a right circular cylinder of radius R that subtends an angle of 'theta knot' at the origin when the reference axis is at the origin and perpendicular to the section.
Lol, isn't it 'theta naught'? As in \theta_0?

I=\int_V R^2\rho dV
is always correct. You should go to cilindrical coordinates for this problem.
 
Help

Hi I am still stuck with with problem of inertia . please can someone help me.
Can you give me more suggestions
Brad
 
If I understand the question correctly, maybe this will help
\int_V R^2\rho dV =\rho \int_V r^2 r dr d\phi dz
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top