Calculating Rotor Moment of Inertia and Time to Slow Down

AI Thread Summary
In a helicopter rotor system, the moment of inertia due to drag is measured at 200Nm, with each of the two blades contributing 100Nm. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how moment of inertia affects the rotor's ability to accelerate or decelerate. To calculate the time required to slow the rotor to 0 RPM, one must consider both the torque and moment of inertia, using specific formulas. The conversation also emphasizes the value of engaging in direct discussions rather than relying solely on online searches for answers. Overall, the thread underscores the complexities of rotor dynamics in helicopter design.
Alwyn Hartman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, here we go.

In a rotating mechanism (helicopter rotor), at a state of equilibrium, the rotor consumes a certain amount of energy from the shaft to maintain a constant angular velocity (since there is a measure of resistance present over the span of the rotor).

Lets suppose that the moment of inertia from all sources of drag acting on the rotor, transmitted to the shaft at a speed of 600RPM is measured to be 200Nm. If the rotor is made of two blades then each blade will have a moment of 100Nm?

Each rotor blade measures 3m from the shaft centre point and has a mass of 80N.

Second, assuming that the moment of inertia remains 200Nm for all angular velocities, how long will it take to slow the rotor to 0 RPM?


Sorry if its vague, I am engaged in a purely academic design of a helicopter but have become lost in the rotating physics!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Moment of inertia" is essentially how hard it is to accelerate or decelerate the rotor. When you say "moment of inertia from drag is 200Nm" you're thinking of the torque from drag. That said if the total torque on the shaft is 200 Nm then indeed each blade will contribute 100 Nm.

In order to answer how long it will take to slow the rotor to 0 rpm, THIS is where the "moment of inertia" comes in. This depends on the shape of the rotor, but your rotor seems simple enough that you could estimate a reasonable value by some calculations (you need to google the formulas for these). Once you have torque and moment of inertia, how fast the rotational speed changes is a matter of another simple formula (again a google search away).
 
Wow, that's probly the most useless piece of advice anyone gives everyone nowadays.

The whole point of coming on this forum is NOT to just be redirected away to another search query. Perhaps you may not have thought of this but, maybe I would like to interact with a real person, not just some static page I can't ask questions to. Why don't we just all get our university degrees from google, the google university... preposterous.
 
What's preposterous is you insulting some one who is trying to help you.
 
Thread locked. Try again, with some humility, appreciation and respect for someone who is only trying to help -- and doing a good job of it.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Back
Top