How can I calculate skin conductance from voltage readings in my research study?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tentativetitle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductance Skin
AI Thread Summary
To calculate skin conductance from voltage readings, a constant voltage of 5V is applied to one finger while measuring the voltage at another finger. The formula provided in the schematic, R = [(+sig) / 5 - (+sig)]6M6, is intended to convert the measured voltage into conductance, but clarification is needed on the term 6M6. There is a discussion about the advantages of using AC measurements over DC due to potential polarization issues that can affect accuracy. The researcher plans to analyze 4-second measurement intervals, applying baseline corrections to mitigate drift. Overall, understanding the conversion formula and measurement techniques is crucial for accurate skin conductance data analysis.
tentativetitle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am collecting skin conductance data for a research study. For this, we apply a constant voltage (5v) to a participants finger and then measure the voltage at another finger (or I think this is what is happening, there is also something about a resistor in there [see attached schematic]).

The software I am using is giving me readings of the voltage being measured on the second electrode, but I need to convert this to conductance. The attached schematic has a formula for doing this - R = [(+sig) / 5 - (+sig)]6M6 - but I don't understand it. I believe that the +sig is the output that I am getting in the software, which would just leave the 6M6 as the term that I don't know. Can anyone shed light on this for me?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
tentativetitle said:
I am collecting skin conductance data for a research study. For this, we apply a constant voltage (5v) to a participants finger and then measure the voltage at another finger (or I think this is what is happening, there is also something about a resistor in there [see attached schematic]).

The software I am using is giving me readings of the voltage being measured on the second electrode, but I need to convert this to conductance. The attached schematic has a formula for doing this - R = [(+sig) / 5 - (+sig)]6M6 - but I don't understand it. I believe that the +sig is the output that I am getting in the software, which would just leave the 6M6 as the term that I don't know. Can anyone shed light on this for me?

Thanks!

Welcome to the PF.

I'm glad to see that you are incorporating the 10uA max safety feature into your GSR project! :smile:

But, shouldn't you be making an AC measurement? DC measurements have issues with polarization altering the measurements...
 
That is a good point. According to this publication: "Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements", it is pretty common to use DC for gsr, but that AC may be preferable, because the polarization issue with the DC can cause drift in the signal.

I will be using measurements of about 4 seconds each in analysis (the four seconds after a given image is shown to the participant) and each of these 4 second chunks will be baseline corrected, using the average activity 1 second before the picture as the baseline. Hopefully this will minimize the measurement drift due to DC, but it sounds like AC would be preferable - something to consider when I get my own lab and purchase equipment.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top