Calculating Solid Volume with Perpendicular Triangular Cross Sections

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solid Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the volume of a solid whose base is defined by the region between the curves y=x and y=x². The solid has cross sections perpendicular to the x-axis that are isosceles right triangles with their hypotenuses lying in the xy-plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss visualizing the solid and the placement of the isosceles triangles. There are attempts to connect the geometric representation of the triangles to the area between the curves. Questions arise about how to express the area of the triangles in terms of the hypotenuse and how to set up the integral for volume calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants are clarifying their understanding of the problem setup and the relationship between the curves and the triangles. Guidance has been offered regarding the geometric properties of the triangles and how to derive the area function for integration. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly concerning the dimensions of the triangles.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and are attempting to visualize the solid and its cross sections. There is an emphasis on understanding the geometric configuration before proceeding with calculations.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



tbe base of a solid is the region between y=x and y=x^2. find the volume of the solid if cross secions perpendicular to the x-axis are isoceles right triangles with hypotenueses in xy plane.

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



honestly i cannot even mentally picture what this looks like, hence i cannot set up my integral. can someone help me understand what the question is even asking?

i know what the base looks like obviously but i cannot picture where these right triangles fit in.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? a little help?
thanks.
 
I'll give you a hint.

Draw the graph of f(x)=x and g(x)=x² on the same grid. (i'm assuming here that the area is from 0 to 1)
Now define the height of this function as h(x) = f(x) - g(x).
h(x) is what you would integrate for area between two curves right?

Now off to the side, draw an isoceles triangle, and find the area in terms of the hypotanuse.

Then connect those two pictures together...

Because in this case, h(x) represents the hypotanuse of the triangle. And you need to imagine the graph you drew in the xy-plane has triangles extending up in the z-direction

good luck!
 
Last edited:
hmm...am i understand this correctly:

so if i draw x and x^2 at each x point, the vertical line drawn from x to x^2 represents the hypoteneuse and the actual triangles come out of the page, and those two legs would be equal to each other? then you repeat that for all x values from 0 to 1?

edit: and therefore the actual right angle of each triangle would be in the air above the paper?

very difficult to mentally picture it...hope I am saying it correctly.
 
so another thing id have to is integrate the area of a triangle (from 0 to 1) but the area function has to be in terms of the hypoteneuse (which would simply be the difference of the two graphs)...correct?
 
Yup, you sound like you're on the right track.

Except, I'm not sure where you got "right triangle" from
 
You are told that the cross sections are "isocelese right triangles with the hypotenuse in the xy-plane" Of course, if an isocelese right triangle has legs of length h, then it has hypotenuse [itex]Y= \sqrt{2}h[/itex] so, reversing that, [itex]h= Y/\sqrt{2}[/itex]. Now, Y is the (vertical) distance between the two curves so it is easy to find Y and then h. Of course, the area of such a triangle is (1/2)h2. Multiply that by the "thickness" of each triangle, dx, and integrate.You are told that the cross sections are "isocelese right triangles with the hypotenuse in the xy-plane" Of course, if an isocelese right triangle has legs of length h, then it has hypotenuse [itex]Y= \sqrt{2}h[/itex] so, reversing that, [itex]h= Y/\sqrt{2}[/itex]. Now, Y is the (vertical) distance between the two curves so it is easy to find Y and then h. Of course, the area of such a triangle is (1/2)h2. Multiply that by the "thickness" of each triangle, dx, and integrate.
 
ChaoticLlama said:
Yup, you sound like you're on the right track.

Except, I'm not sure where you got "right triangle" from

the problem says "isoceles right triangles"
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are told that the cross sections are "isocelese right triangles with the hypotenuse in the xy-plane" Of course, if an isocelese right triangle has legs of length h, then it has hypotenuse [itex]Y= \sqrt{2}h[/itex] so, reversing that, [itex]h= Y/\sqrt{2}[/itex]. Now, Y is the (vertical) distance between the two curves so it is easy to find Y and then h. Of course, the area of such a triangle is (1/2)h2. Multiply that by the "thickness" of each triangle, dx, and integrate.You are told that the cross sections are "isocelese right triangles with the hypotenuse in the xy-plane" Of course, if an isocelese right triangle has legs of length h, then it has hypotenuse [itex]Y= \sqrt{2}h[/itex] so, reversing that, [itex]h= Y/\sqrt{2}[/itex]. Now, Y is the (vertical) distance between the two curves so it is easy to find Y and then h. Of course, the area of such a triangle is (1/2)h2. Multiply that by the "thickness" of each triangle, dx, and integrate.

I worked on this last night before reading your post: let me know if this is the same thing and if I am on the right track.

my integral is from 0 to 1 of the function [(x-x^2)^2]/4

i got that because the area of a triangle is obviously 1/2 bh, but both my b and my h are (x/square root of 2) where x is the hypotenuse. but since my hypotenuse is just the difference of the two functions i substituted in x-x^2. how does that sound?

(i really need to learn how to make those functions look nice on this forum...)
 
  • #10
You're correct, now multiply out and integrate! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K