Calculating Spectroscopic Dissociation Energy for 127-I2 Molecule

AI Thread Summary
The spectroscopic dissociation energy for the 127-I2 molecule is 1.542 eV, which translates to approximately 2.47 x 10^-19 joules. To find the wavelength of light needed for dissociation while achieving a velocity of 1000 m/s for the atoms, it's essential to account for the additional kinetic energy required. The correct approach involves using the equation wavelength = hc/E, where E must include both the dissociation energy and the kinetic energy calculated from KE = 1/2 mv^2. The initial calculation of energy per bond appears to be incorrect, suggesting a need to directly apply the energy values without unnecessary conversions. Ultimately, the light's energy must exceed the dissociation energy to provide the necessary kinetic energy for the atoms.
hellos
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The spectroscopic dissociation energy of 127-I2 is 1.542eV. What wavelength of light would be needed to dissociate the molecule and have the atoms move apart at velocities of 1000 m/s?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was convert 1.542eV to joules which became 2.47x10^-19 joules/mol. After that I found the total energy per bond by dividing the energy be avagadro's number = 4.1x10^-43. Then plugged it into wavelength = hc/E = 4.8x10^17m. But this didn't look right. Am I going about it the wrong way? Or should I just go straight to wavelength = hc/E using the 1.542eV to find the wavelength. Or work backwards using KE=1/2 mv^2?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.542 eV is energy required for 1 molecule to be dissociated. However, your light must carry more energy, as the atoms need kinetic energy.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top