Calculating Speed of Sound in Nickel using Atomic Properties

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of sound in a nickel bar using its atomic properties and Young's modulus. The initial calculations led to an incorrect time of 0.000538 seconds for sound to travel through the bar. Participants pointed out that the change in length caused by the weight should not affect the calculation after the weight is removed, as the bar returns to its original length. A correction in the calculation of Young's modulus was identified as the source of the error, leading to the correct answer. The importance of accurate calculations and assumptions about material properties was emphasized throughout the discussion.
jhyrman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From WebAssign:
One mole of nickel (6.02e23 atoms) has a mass of 59 g, and its density is 8.9 g/cm3. You have a bar of nickel 2.44 m long, with a square cross section, 1.8 mm on a side. You hang the rod vertically and attach a 45 kg mass to the bottom, and you observe that the bar becomes 1.6 mm longer. Next you remove the 45 kg mass, place the rod horizontally, and strike one end with a hammer. How much time T will elapse before a microphone at the other end of the bar will detect a disturbance? (Assume a simple cubic lattice for nickel.)

Homework Equations


Young's modulus, diameter of an atom, v=ωd

The Attempt at a Solution


tl;dr - I'm getting 0.000538 seconds, not the right answer.

Atomic Size and Mass:

1) convert given density to kg/m^3 = 8900kg/m^3
2) convert to moles/m^3 (kg/m^3 * mol/kg) = 150847 mol/m^3 (not rounding in my actual calculations)
3) convert to atoms/m^3 (6.022^23 atoms/mol) = 9.084e28 atoms/m^3
4) take the cube root to get the number of atoms per meter, = 4495309334 atoms/m
5) take the reciprocal to get the diameter of an atom, = 2.2245e-10 m/atom
6) find the mass of one atom (kg/mol * mol/atoms) = 9.7974e-26 kg/atom

Young's Modulus: Y=(F/A)/(dL/L)

1) F=mg = (45kg)(9.8N/kg) = 441 N
2) A = (0.0018m)^2 = 3.5344e-6 m^2
3) dL = 0.0016m
4) L = 2.44m
5) Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2

Interatomic Spring Stiffness: Ks,i = dY

1) From above, diameter of one atom = 2.2245e-10 m
2) From above, Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2
3) Ks,i = 40.799 N/m (not rounding in my actual calculations)

Speed of Sound: v = ωd

1) ω = √(Ks,i / m,a)
2) From above, Ks,i = 40.799 N/m
3) From above, m,a = 9.7974e-26 kg
4) ω=2.0406e13 N/m*kg
5) From above, d=2.2245e-10 m
6) v=ωd = 4539 m/s (not rounding in actual calculations)

Time Elapsed:

1) length sound traveled = L+dL = 2.44166 m
2) From above, speed of sound = 4539 m/s
3) T = (L+dL)/v = 0.000537505 s
which is not the correct answer.

Thank you for reading and for your feedback,

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of sound is the square root of the ratio of the elastic modulus to density.
##v=\sqrt{\frac{Y}{\rho}}##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jhyrman
jhyrman said:

Homework Statement


From WebAssign:
One mole of nickel (6.02e23 atoms) has a mass of 59 g, and its density is 8.9 g/cm3. You have a bar of nickel 2.44 m long, with a square cross section, 1.8 mm on a side. You hang the rod vertically and attach a 45 kg mass to the bottom, and you observe that the bar becomes 1.6 mm longer. Next you remove the 45 kg mass, place the rod horizontally, and strike one end with a hammer. How much time T will elapse before a microphone at the other end of the bar will detect a disturbance? (Assume a simple cubic lattice for nickel.)

Homework Equations


Young's modulus, diameter of an atom, v=ωd

The Attempt at a Solution


tl;dr - I'm getting 0.000538 seconds, not the right answer.

Atomic Size and Mass:

1) convert given density to kg/m^3 = 8900kg/m^3
2) convert to moles/m^3 (kg/m^3 * mol/kg) = 150847 mol/m^3 (not rounding in my actual calculations)
3) convert to atoms/m^3 (6.022^23 atoms/mol) = 9.084e28 atoms/m^3
4) take the cube root to get the number of atoms per meter, = 4495309334 atoms/m
5) take the reciprocal to get the diameter of an atom, = 2.2245e-10 m/atom
6) find the mass of one atom (kg/mol * mol/atoms) = 9.7974e-26 kg/atom

Young's Modulus: Y=(F/A)/(dL/L)

1) F=mg = (45kg)(9.8N/kg) = 441 N
2) A = (0.0018m)^2 = 3.5344e-6 m^2
3) dL = 0.0016m
4) L = 2.44m
5) Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2

Interatomic Spring Stiffness: Ks,i = dY

1) From above, diameter of one atom = 2.2245e-10 m
2) From above, Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2
3) Ks,i = 40.799 N/m (not rounding in my actual calculations)

Speed of Sound: v = ωd

1) ω = √(Ks,i / m,a)
2) From above, Ks,i = 40.799 N/m
3) From above, m,a = 9.7974e-26 kg
4) ω=2.0406e13 N/m*kg
5) From above, d=2.2245e-10 m
6) v=ωd = 4539 m/s (not rounding in actual calculations)

Time Elapsed:

1) length sound traveled = L+dL = 2.44166 m
2) From above, speed of sound = 4539 m/s
3) T = (L+dL)/v = 0.000537505 s
which is not the correct answer.

Thank you for reading and for your feedback,

Josh

The nickel bar has the 45 kg weight removed from the end and is laid flat before being struck.

Why do you include the change in length due to this weight (which is no longer present) in the calculation of the time it takes for sound to travel thru the rod?
 
  • Like
Likes jhyrman and PietKuip
Thank you PietKuip, that does make it a lot easier. I still get the same result.

SteamKing, I tried it with and without. After rounding to correct sig figs, the result is the same so I know that's not the problem. I wasn't sure how elastic metal is, but I suppose it would go back to it's original length after the weight is removed.
 
jhyrman said:
SteamKing, I tried it with and without. After rounding to correct sig figs, the result is the same so I know that's not the problem. I wasn't sure how elastic metal is, but I suppose it would go back to it's original length after the weight is removed.

Yes, it is reasonable to assume that the bar will return to its original length once the weight is removed.
 
Thank you for your help. I found the problem in my math calculating Young's modulus. I corrected that and it finally got the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top