Calculating Speed of Sports Car at Inelastic Collision

AI Thread Summary
A 920-kg sports car collides with a 2300-kg SUV, resulting in an inelastic collision where both vehicles skid 2.8 meters before stopping. The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed of the sports car using momentum conservation and frictional force. The force of friction is determined to be 25,244 N, which is used to find the deceleration and subsequently the initial speed. Participants emphasize the importance of using kinematic equations and conservation of momentum to solve the problem effectively. The conversation highlights the need to work backwards from the final state to determine the initial speed of the sports car.
ace123
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
A 920-kg sports car collides into a rear end of a 2300 kg SUV stopped at a red light. The bumpers lock, the brakes are locked, and the two cars skid foward 2.8 m before stopping. The police officer, knowing that the coefficient of kinetic friction between tires and road is .80 , calculates the speed of the sports car at impact. What was that speed?

This is all that I did before I got stuck.

I set up the conservation of momentum :920 kg * V_{1}= 3220 * V_2{}

Then I did F\Deltat= \DeltaP

I found the force to be 25244= 3220 V_{2} / \Deltat

Now is where I get stuck. I think I did something wrong because I'm pretty sure I need to do v/t =d.

Also not sure if I should use kinetic energy in this one since it's not conserved.

Any help will be great. Thanks as always.

On a side note: Isn't it hilarious how the officer knows the kinetic friction and calculates the speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For this problem you need to work backwards. You have equations of kinematics, from which you can calculate the inital speed of the two interlocked cars (remember that for any force, including friction, F=m*a).

After that you can used conservation of momentum (the fact that m1v1=m2v2) to calculate the initial speed of the moving car.

----------------------
theUndergrad

http://www.theUndergraduateJournal.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
why didn't I think of that. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top