Calculating Stopping Distance of Car: Formula & Var. Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter laneschmidt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the stopping distance of a car using two different formulas. The initial attempt to calculate the stopping distance resulted in an incorrect answer due to not accounting for the negative acceleration during deceleration. The correct stopping distance was determined using an average velocity formula, yielding the right answer. The confusion arose from not knowing when to apply each formula correctly, highlighting the importance of recognizing acceleration direction. Properly applying the negative sign for deceleration is crucial for accurate calculations.
laneschmidt
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
This is a classic case of using the wrong formula for the question. My problem is that, using the given information, both formulas could've been used (to the best of my knowledge)

1. Homework Statement
A car traveling at 22.4 m/s comes to a stop in 2.55 s. Determine the stopping distance of the car, assuming that acceleration is uniform.

Homework Equations


Let d=displacement
d=Vi*t+0.5at2
d=(Vi+Vf)/2t
a=∆v/t[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


1. I determined that the rate of acceleration was 8.78 m/s^2→ 22.4 m/s/2.55 s = 8.78 m/s2
2. I had all the variables needed so I used the above equation:
d=(22.4 m/s)(2.55 s) + 0.5(8.78 m/s2)(2.55)2
d=85.7 m (wrong answer)

3. After some confusion I decided to try another equation, the latter equation above:
d=(22.4 m/s + 0 m/s)/2(2.55 s)
d=28.6 m (right answer)[/B]

This confuses me. Clearly I do not know when to use each equation, even when both could be used with respect to the variables given. Some insight on this would be appreciated! Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first method is correct if you use the correct (negative) sign for the acceleration.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes laneschmidt
Thanks Chet! I overlooked the fact that the car was decelerating.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top