Calculating Sum of Three Correlated Gaussian Distributions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the sum of three correlated Gaussian distributions with different means and standard deviations. The user initially seeks guidance on summing these distributions, having already figured out how to sum two. Key formulas for variance and standard deviation are shared, emphasizing the importance of correlation between the datasets. The user clarifies that correlations between each pair of datasets vary, complicating the summation process. Ultimately, they determine that the variance of all three distributions can be calculated using a comprehensive formula that incorporates the correlations and standard deviations of each set.
mpoirier
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have three sets of data that I’ve used to create three Gaussian distributions which have different means and standard deviations. The data sets are also correlated as the data is dependent on time. I want to compare the sum of two distributions with the sum of three distributions to find which sets of distribution produce the best stdev as a percentage of the mean.

Now, I think I know how to sum two of the distributions together, but how do I sum the three?

To find the new mean of two distributions, simply add the two initial means together.
To find the new stdev of the two distributions, use the following formulas.
First, find the variance.
(1) Var(X1, X2) = stdev1^2 + stdev2^2 + 2cov(X1, X2)
(2) Correl(X1, X2) = cov(X1, X2) / (stdev1 * stdev2)
And you obtain… (2) into (1)
Var(X1, X2) = stdev1^2 + stdev2^2 + 2 * Correl(X1,X2) * (stdev1 * stdev2)

Then the stdev is simple the square root of the variance.

None of the three samples are completely independent or dependent. In other words, the correlation is not equal to 0 or 1.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now, I think I know how to sum two of the distributions together, but how do I sum the three?
The same way you would add three numbers together: you start by adding two of them.
 
Sorry, I don't think I explained the question properly.
The problem is that there is a different correlation between each data set.
For example:
Set 1 and Set 2 have a correl of .71
Set 1 and Set 3 have a correl of .80
Set 2 and Set 3 have a correl of .70

So, if I simply solve it out twice, what do I use for the correl between the solution of Set 1/2 and Set 3? That's if I solve it the way you just suggested.
 
My bad, I didn't catch the entire problem. :frown:
 
Ok, I figured out how to answer my own question. You just plug in all the numbers into the following equation.
Var(X1, X2, X3) = stdev1^2 + stdev2^2 + stdev3^2 + 2 * Correl(X1,X2) * (stdev1 * stdev2) + 2 * Correl(X1,X3) * (stdev1 * stdev3) + 2 * Correl (X2,X3) * (stdev2 * stdev3)

Anyways, thanks Hurkyl for trying to help.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top