Calculating Tension in Ropes Connecting Multiple Barges

  • Thread starter Thread starter KatyM7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in ropes connecting a boat to two barges, considering their respective inertias and resistive forces. For barge A, the tension is derived from its inertia and the resistive force, while for barge B, a similar calculation is performed, factoring in its own resistive force. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding net forces and free body diagrams to accurately assess the forces acting on each barge. The concept of "contact force" is clarified as the force exerted when objects are in contact, aligning with Newton's laws. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for a thorough understanding of these principles to solve the tension calculation problem effectively.
KatyM7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A boat pulls two barges down the river. The barge connected to the boat (barge A) has an inertia of 2x10^5 kg, and the other barge (barge B) has an inertia of 3x10^5 kg. the resistive force between barge A and the water is 7x10^3 N, and the resistive fore of barge B to the water is 9x10^3 N. The common acceleration of all three boats is .4 m/s^2. Even thought the ropes are huge, the gravitational exerted on them is much smaller than the pulling forces.

Homework Equations


(a). What is the tension in the rope that connects the boat to barge A?
(b). What is the tension in the rope that connects the two barges?
(c). Repeat steps a and b for the case in which the order of the barges is reversed.

The Attempt at a Solution


So for part (a) I took the contact force of the rope to barge A which is 2x10^5kg * .4m/s^2= 8x10^4 N and added the negative of the resistive force; 8x10^4N - 7x10^3N= 7.3x10^4N. I wasn't sure if I should also subtract the contact force of the second rope on barge A which would cancel out the two contact forces and the answer would be the resitive force of barge A and the water.
(b). Contact force of the second rope on barge B; 3x10^5kg * .4m/s^2 = 1.2x10^5N; subtract the resistive force of barge B to the water; 1.2x10^5N - 9x10^3N = 1.11x10^5N. Again not sure if I should add the contact force of the first rope on barge B.
(c). They would be the same unless I do subtract/add the parts I'm not sure about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is this "contact force"? Are you translating from another language?

Anyway, do you know about free body diagrams? Newton'e second law? Net force?
 
nasu said:
What is this "contact force"? Are you translating from another language?

Anyway, do you know about free body diagrams? Newton'e second law? Net force?
Contact force is what we are being taught. It is the a force that one object exerts on another object only when the two objects are in physical contact. It is a part of Newton's third law which states whenever two objects interact they exert on each other forces that are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. For example FC1,2 = -FC2,1
We use contact and gravitational forces in our free body diagrams; Newton's second law- the vector sum (net force) of all forces exerted on an object (contact and gravitational forces) is equal to the rate of change of momentum of the object.
We use a textbook that was released this year that introduces different concepts than other physics textbooks.
 
OK. But then why do you equate the "contact force" from the rope with mass*acceleration for the barge?
This "contact force" is not the net force on that barge. There are other forces acting on it.
The "net" in the net force is essential. Thus is why a free body diagram is of great help.
You draw the barge under question (for example) and all the forces acting on it. Then you write the net force and equate with m*a.
 
nasu said:
OK. But then why do you equate the "contact force" from the rope with mass*acceleration for the barge?
This "contact force" is not the net force on that barge. There are other forces acting on it.
The "net" in the net force is essential. Thus is why a free body diagram is of great help.
You draw the barge under question (for example) and all the forces acting on it. Then you write the net force and equate with m*a.
Oh, we learned that Net force of barge B for example = ΣFbarge B = all the forces acting on barge B so we would do ΣFbarge B = FCrope 2, barge B + FCwater, barge B + FGEarth, barge B + FCbarge B, Earth + FCrope 1, barge B
I know it probably sounds weird, it did to me at first as well, but it's the way the book asks for it lol. And now that I wrote all of that out I think I know the answer now, so thank you! :)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top