Calculating the Amount of Lauric Acid Dispersed on Water Surface

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the amount of lauric acid dispersed on a water surface area of 500 cm², one must first determine the number of molecules required to cover that area using the molecule's cross-sectional area of 18.2 Ų. By modeling the lauric acid molecules as spheres, the radius can be calculated to facilitate determining the best packing fraction for a single layer. The density of lauric acid at 0.78 g/cm³ will also be needed to convert the number of molecules into grams and subsequently moles. The key challenge is finding the number of moles of lauric acid based on these calculations. Ultimately, the solution involves combining these elements to arrive at the total amount of lauric acid dispersed.
kimia786
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lauric acid , CH3(CH2)10CO2H has been dispersed 500cm2+ on the water surface. Assume that the cross-sectional area of acid molecule to be 18.2A2+ and the density of the initial acid is 0.78gcm3-, calculate the amount of acid that dispersed on the surface of water.

* the problem i face is, i don't know how to find number of moles of lauric acid...
please some one help me...


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to determine the minimum amount of lauric acid that will cover the surface of area 500 cm2. Each molecule has a cross sectional area of 18.2 square angstroms. Assume the lauric acid can be described by a sphere of radius √(18.2/∏) in angstroms. Find out the best packing fraction that a single layer array of spheres covering a surface would be and count them for 500 cm2.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top