Calculating the Apparent Angle of the Moon's Diameter from Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter onetroubledguy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the apparent angle of the Moon's diameter from Earth, the radius of the Moon and the average distance to Earth are used. The correct method involves taking the inverse tangent of the ratio of the Moon's radius to the Earth-Moon distance, rather than doubling the radius before calculation. The initial calculation of 51.92 degrees is incorrect, as it should yield a much smaller angle, approximately 0.2596 degrees. The discussion highlights the importance of using the correct trigonometric approach and understanding the geometry involved. Overall, the correct apparent angle is significantly less than initially calculated.
onetroubledguy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The problem is -

Consider the following accept constants:

Radius of the moon = 1.74 x 10^6 m
Average moon-earth distance = 3.84 x 10^8 m

a) What is the apparent angle the diameter of the moon subtends, as seen from the earth? Answer in units of degrees.

I doubled the radius of the moon to get the diameter, and then divided the result by the moon-earth distance. Then, I took the inverse tangent of the result.

I get 51.92 degrees. My college website is telling me this is wrong. Do you get a different answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tan(51.92°) = 1.276, so it would appear there is an error in the computation.

The ratio of 2*Lunar Diameter to Earth-Moon distance is ~0.009, so the tan-1 should be small - less than 1°.
 
onetroubledguy said:
Then, I took the inverse tangent of the result. I get 51.92 degrees. My college website is telling me this is wrong.

Did you check that your calculator was set to the appropriate degrees/radians setting?
 
Why did you doubled the lunar radius before taking the inverse tangeant? The tan thing works on rectangle-triangles only. I say find the angle subtented by half of the moon, and then multiply that angle by 2 to get the total angle subtented by the diameter.
 
quasar987 said:
Why did you doubled the lunar radius before taking the inverse tangeant? The tan thing works on rectangle-triangles only. I say find the angle subtented by half of the moon, and then multiply that angle by 2 to get the total angle subtented by the diameter.

Wouldn't you get the same answer?

Well, the angle subtended by half the moon is 25.96. So 25.96*2 = 51.92
 
I get 0.2596; 100 times less.
 
quasar987 said:
I get 0.2596; 100 times less.

I thought 0.2596 needs to be converted into a percent? Is that the only mistake I made? :cry:

Yeah I'm an idiot. Now that I actually picture how insane of a degree 51.92 would be, it's clear as day. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Even you have made a mistake by changing it into percentage, but I don't understand why you have to double the radius of the moon. Isn't it
arc tan(radius of the moon/moon-earth distance) is the answer? Thank you.
 
Back
Top