Calculating the Average Value of Square Spin for a Composite System

Gvido_Anselmi
Messages
31
Reaction score
6
Hello everyone.
Let us consider two fermions whose spin state wave functions are certain (normalized) ##\psi_{1}## and ##\psi_{2}##.
So the overall normalized spin state wave function of this system is of the form:

##\psi = (1/\sqrt{2})(\psi_{1} \psi_{2} - \psi_{2} \psi_{1})##

Is there any difference between calculating the total square spin operator ##\hat S^{2}## eigenvalue and the average value of ##S^{2}##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem was to calculate average value of ##S^2## for given spin state wave functions of two electrons. Honestly I don't understand the meaning of this problem. We know that total square spin operator's eigenvalues are ##S^{2}=S(S+1)## and take values ##0## or ##2##. Eigenvalues of linear Hermitian operator are observables or average values of physical quantities by definition. So what does it mean to take average value of average value or there is something I understand wrong?
 
Last edited:
I see your confusion.

You are right that the (vector) addition of the individual spins gives us either ##S^2=0 \Rightarrow S=0## or ##S^2=2 \Rightarrow S = 1##.
Now these states correspond to the singlet and triplet states of this composite system.
The singlet state has (as the name suggests) 1 state (##S_z##).
But for the triplet state we can have spin along the z-axis ##-1,\, 0,\, +1##.

Now if you say that each of these states is equally probable i.e. the density matrix is proportional to the unit matrix.
In that case ##0\leq \langle S^2 \rangle \leq 2##, check that.
 
Gvido_Anselmi said:
The problem was to calculate average value of ##\S^2## for given spin state wave function. Honestly I don't understand the meaning of this problem. We know that total square spin operator's eigenvalues are ##S^{2}=S(S+1)## and take values ##0## or ##2##. Eigenvalues of linear Hermitian operator are observables or average values of physical quantities.
JorisL said:
I see your confusion.

You are right that the (vector) addition of the individual spins gives us either ##S^2=0 \Rightarrow S=0## or ##S^2=2 \Rightarrow S = 1##.
Now these states correspond to the singlet and triplet states of this composite system.
The singlet state has (as the name suggests) 1 state (##S_z##).
But for the triplet state we can have spin along the z-axis ##-1,\, 0,\, +1##.

Now if you say that each of these states is equally probable i.e. the density matrix is proportional to the unit matrix.
In that case ##0\leq \langle S^2 \rangle \leq 2##, check that.

Obvious! I have forgotten that spin-state wave function is not always antisymmetric. In general case we should expand it in a linear combination of antisymmetric (singlet) and symmetric (triplet) parts. I can guess that ##S^2=2P## where ##P## is the norm of triplet state and the proof is not too difficult.
Thank you very much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top