Calculating the constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
An automobile accelerates from 40 m/s to 80 m/s over a distance of 200 m, prompting a discussion on calculating constant acceleration. Two approaches were attempted: one involving time calculation, which led to an incorrect acceleration of 8.0 m/s², and another that directly applied the velocity-position relationship, yielding the correct acceleration of 12 m/s². The validity of assuming the initial position as xi=0 was confirmed as acceptable for this calculation. The consensus is that time is not necessary for solving this problem, as the constant acceleration equation suffices. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the appropriate equations for motion without needing to determine time.
thushanthan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An automobile moving along a straight track changes its velocity from 40 m/s to 80 m/s in a distance of 200 m. What is the (constant) acceleration component of the vehicle during this time?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I try to solve this problems with 2 different approaches.

First :

Since we don't know the time (t) , we need to calculate the time. If we assume the initial position as xi=0 and VxAvg as 40 m/s , then I am getting t=5 sec. But that doesn't help me to reach the final answer. I ended up with 8.0m/s2.

Second:

If I didn't care about the time(t) and if I use Velocity as a function of position eq ( assuming xi =0 ) then I am getting the correct answer which is 12m/s2.

My question is "Can I assume the initial position is xi=0? IS IT CORRECT?"

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second method is correct. We don't need the time for this problem, as we can use the constant acceleration equation that relates initial velocity, acceleration, initial location, and final location to final velocity.
 
Thank you o:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top