Calculating the Density Function for Redistribution of Melted Ice on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter metgt4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia of Earth if all ice melted and was evenly redistributed. The original poster has determined the moment of inertia for both the grounded ice and the Earth without it but seeks guidance on redistributing the mass. A participant suggests treating the mass as a thin shell surrounding the Earth, allowing the use of the formula I=2/3*MR^2 for calculations. The original poster acknowledges their previous approach of estimating as a disc and appreciates the clarification. This exchange highlights the complexities of modeling mass distribution in geophysical scenarios.
metgt4
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hey Everybody,

Right now I'm working on a what would happen to the moment of inertia if all of the ice on Earth melted and were to be redistributed. I've found the moment of inertia of all of the grounded ice on Earth and the moment of inertia of the Earth without this ice, but now I need to redistribute this mass evenly over the surface of the earth. I know that the moment of inertia of this redistribution could be shown as a disc of infinitesimal thickness at the equator, but the mass distribution would be less at the centre of this disc and increase as you got further and further from the centre. How would you go about finding the density function in this problem? This one has me stumped!

Thanks!
Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the mass is distributed evenly, it would be a shell of uniform thickness surrounding the Earth. Since this shell is very thin compared to Earth's radius, you can compute its moment of inertia using I=2/3*MR^2, valid for a thin shell.
 
Oh, man, I must REALLY need some sleep! I just got in the routine of estimating everything as a disc rotating around the axis. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction there.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top