Calculating the distance to a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Dad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance to a second star based on its properties compared to a first star, with the first star being 1 parsec away. The user derives that the surface gravity of star 1 is ten times that of star 2, leading to a calculated distance of 3.16 parsecs for star 2. However, feedback indicates that while the distance calculation is correct, the ratio of the radii should be 3.16, not 10, as the latter represents the ratio of surface areas. The user seeks confirmation and further clarification on their calculations.
Physics Dad
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
I have made an effort to answer this question, and would like to know if my thinking is correct. I would appreciate any feedback.

Thank you!


Homework Statement


Two stars in the sky have similar effective temperatures, masses and apparent brightness. However, star 1 has a surface gravity which is 10 times higher than star 2. If star 1 is 1pc away, what is the distance to star 2?

Homework Equations


i) g*=GM*/R*2
ii) f*=L*/4πd*2
iii) L*=4πR*2σT*eff4
iv) m*1-m*2=-2.5log(f*1/f*2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Based upon the question, I can assume that the mass (M*), the effective temperature (T*eff) and the apparent magnitude (m*) of both stars is the same.

First of all, I will start with the gravity which tells me that:

g*1=10g*2

so using equation i) I can say that:

GM/R*12=10GM/R*22

I can then rearrange to get a ratio of radii which will tell me that...

R*12/R*22=10-1

I can then calculate the ratio of fluxes by substituting equation iii) into equation ii),= and doing some cancelling to find that...

f*1/f*2=d*22(R*12/R*22)

I know that the value of R*12/R*22=10-1 so I can sub this value in

as I know that both apparent magnitudes are the same, I can say that m*1-m*2=0 and then sub in my ratio of fluxes to equation 4 to get...

0=-2.5log(d*22/10)

I can then solve this equation for d*2 and I get...

d*2=3.16pc

This seems feasible given that star two would have a radius 10 times bigger than star 1, but I would appreciate any help or advice anyone can offer.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics Dad said:
d*2=3.16pc

This seems feasible given that star two would have a radius 10 times bigger than star 1, but I would appreciate any help or advice anyone can offer.

Thank you!
Answer is correct, but it imply radius ratio of 3.16, not 10. 10 is the surface areas ratio.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top