I Calculating the eigenvalue of orbital angular momentum

TheBlueDot
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I'm trying to calculate the measurement of the orbital angular momentum of the state l=1 and m = -1. The operator for the angular momentum squared is
## L^2 = -\hbar (\frac{1}{sin\theta}(\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(sin\theta\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta})) +\frac{1}{sin\theta^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}) ##,

which expands to
## L^2 = -\hbar (\frac{1}{sin\theta}(\frac{\partial sin\theta}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}+sin\theta \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2}) +\frac{1}{sin\theta^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}) ##

When operate this on the wave function ##Y_{1,-1} = csin\theta e^{-i\phi}##, I got

##Y_{1,-1}*(\frac{cos^2\theta}{sin\theta} -\frac{sin^2\theta}{sin\theta}-\frac{1}{sin\theta})##,

which is zero. The answer should be ##2\hbar^2##.

If the cosine term is zero, then I'll get the right result.

Please help!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheBlueDot said:
Hello,

I'm trying to calculate the measurement of the orbital angular momentum of the state l=1 and m = -1. The operator for the angular momentum squared is
## L^2 = -\hbar (\frac{1}{sin\theta}(\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(sin\theta\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta})) +\frac{1}{sin\theta^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}) ##,

which expands to
## L^2 = -\hbar (\frac{1}{sin\theta}(\frac{\partial sin\theta}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}+sin\theta \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2}) +\frac{1}{sin\theta^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}) ##

When operate this on the wave function ##Y_{1,-1} = csin\theta e^{-i\phi}##, I got

##Y_{1,-1}*(\frac{cos^2\theta}{sin\theta} -\frac{sin^2\theta}{sin\theta}-\frac{1}{sin\theta})##,

which is zero. The answer should be ##2\hbar^2##.

If the cosine term is zero, then I'll get the right result.

Please help!

Thanks

##\frac{cos^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)} - \frac{sin^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)} - \frac{1}{sin(\theta)} = \frac{1-sin^2(\theta) - sin^2(\theta) - 1}{sin(\theta)} = \frac{-2 sin^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)} = -2 sin(\theta)##
 
  • Like
Likes TheBlueDot and BvU
stevendaryl said:
##\frac{cos^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)} - \frac{sin^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)} - \frac{1}{sin(\theta)} = \frac{1-sin^2(\theta) - sin^2(\theta) - 1}{sin(\theta)} = \frac{-2 sin^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)} = -2 sin(\theta)##
@stevendaryl,
Thanks for your response. I feel silly now. I looked at the ##sin^2(\theta) -1 ## and thought it was ##cos^2(\theta)##.
 
  • Like
Likes stevendaryl
It doesn't say ##\ \ \sin^2(\theta) -1\ ##, but ##\ \ - \sin^2(\theta) -1\ \ ## :rolleyes:
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top