Calculating the Height of a Cliff using Projectile Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolkid26
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A stone is thrown upward from a cliff at 10 m/s and falls into a lake 20 meters below. The time taken for the stone to fall is calculated to be approximately 2.02 seconds, with an impact velocity of about 19.8 m/s. To find the height of the cliff, it is clarified that the cliff's height is 20 meters relative to the lake. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the downward acceleration of gravity and the initial upward velocity in the calculations. The correct application of motion equations is crucial for determining the cliff's height accurately.
coolkid26
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A stone is thrown off a cliff upward at a rate of 10 m/s. It then falls from the height of the throw down into a lake 20M below. How long does it take for the stone to fall? What is its impact velocity? What is the height of the cliff?

Homework Equations


v=vi+at
x=xi+vi+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


x=xi+vi+1/2at^2
20=0+0+1/2(9.8 x t^2)
40=9.8t^2
t^2=4
t=2.02s

v=vi+at
v=0+(9.8)(2.02)
v=19.8 m/sx=final distance
xi=initial distance
vi=initial velocity
v=final velocity
a=acceleration of gravity (9.8)
t=time

Can someone help me to find the height of the cliff? I got the time and impact velocity but am unsure of how to get the heigh of the cliff. Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the cliff would be 20m relative to the lake...Shouldn't really matter relative to anything else should it? If the cliff is 100m and the lake 80m high or if the cliff is 0m high and the lake -20m you still get the same answer.

Also remember that you want to find the time when you are 20m below the initial height. So if you take the height of the cliff to be 0m you want position -20m. Lastly remember that the acceleration of gravity is downwards and you have initial velocity. My equation of motion and elapsed time differ from yours.
 
Last edited:
Something I didn't catch before in your equation of motion, you need half the acceleration. Not half of the product gt^{2}.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top