Calculating the hydrostatic pressure on a tube

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating hydrostatic pressure for a submarine project involving a perspex tube designed to be submerged to 100 meters. Key parameters include the tube's dimensions, material properties, and internal pressure. Participants suggest utilizing online engineering calculators and provide relevant resources for strength calculations related to pressure vessels. The original poster expresses gratitude for the helpful links, particularly one that meets their needs. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding deformation, critical pressure, and potential failure modes in design.
Orben24
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.
I'm working on a submarine project and my goal is submerging it to 100m, but I'm having trouble calculating the parameters i need.
I'm working with a perspex tube (E is about 1.3Gpa), 26mm inside diameter and 30mm outside diameter. the tube X meters long with inside pressure of 1 atm.

I'd be happy if you guys could direct me to the right formulas (and how to derive them) for the deformation (ε), the critical pressure (Pc) and would it fail from buckling or by compression.

Thanks for the help! very much :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Back
Top