Calculating the Limit of (1 + 2^x)^(2^(-x))

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the limit of the expression (1 + 2^x)^(2^(-x)) as x approaches infinity. Participants explore the implications of substituting different values and the behavior of the expression in relation to Euler's number.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limit behavior of the expression and question the validity of assumptions made regarding the relationship to Euler's number. There are mentions of using exponential functions and l'Hopital's rule as potential approaches.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions about the variable 'a' and its boundedness. Some guidance has been offered regarding the limits and their relationship to Euler's number, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the limits being considered may not align with the standard definition of Euler's number, particularly when substituting different forms for 'a'. There is an acknowledgment of the need for the terms within the parentheses to approach one rather than infinity.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
(1 + a^x)^(a^(-x))
(1 + a^x)^(a^(-x))
Let's assume a, say, two.

the limit of it, with x tending to infinity,
1589004694518.png
is one, but i was thinking...
Calling 2^x by a, we have that when x tend to infinity, so do a, So:
1589004584056.png
that is euler number no? Contradictory... where am i wrong?
 

Attachments

  • 1589004449884.png
    1589004449884.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 234
Physics news on Phys.org
LCSphysicist said:
one

That's what I got. The way I usually deal with limits of this form is to express it as a function of the exponential function and the natural logarithm, then use l'Hopital's rule on the power.
 
Eclair_de_XII said:
That's what I got. The way I usually deal with limits of this form is to express it as a function of the exponential function and the natural logarithm, then use l'Hopital's rule on the power.
Yes but, what is wrong in the second case?
 
I think that the problem is that ##a## is not bounded, and it would not be the same as the limit for Euler's number if you tried to put it that way. For example, if you let ##a=\frac{1}{n^2}##, then as ##a\rightarrow \infty##, ##n^2\rightarrow 0^+##. Then your second limit becomes:

##\lim_{a \rightarrow \infty}(1+a)^{\frac{1}{a}}=\lim_{n^2\rightarrow 0}(1+\frac{1}{n^2})^{n^2}\neq e##

Maybe if you switched around the negative signs in the equation in the Relevant Equations part of your post, it would be some function of Euler's number.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
Euler's number is ##\lim (1+\frac{1}{n})^n ## as ##n\to \infty## or equivalently ##\lim (1+n)^{\frac{1}{n}}## as ##n\to 0##.

BUT you have ##\lim (1+n)^{\frac{1}{n}}## as ##n\to \infty##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, FactChecker and LCSphysicist
Delta2 said:
Euler's number is ##\lim (1+\frac{1}{n})^n ## as ##n\to \infty## or equivalently ##\lim (1+n)^{\frac{1}{n}}## as ##n\to 0##.

BUT you have ##\lim (1+n)^{\frac{1}{n}}## as ##n\to \infty##
Oh so i was wrong to think that the third therm was too equivalent.
I really messed me up, the terms between the parentheses need to tend to one, not to infinity... thank you both guys
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K