Calculating the potential of a charged ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential of a charged ring on the z-axis, given a specific surface charge density. The initial steps involve determining the total charge on the ring and expressing the potential using the formula for electric potential. Confirmation of the approach and calculations is sought, with one participant affirming the correctness of the final expression for potential, as it aligns with results from Poisson's equation. Suggestions are made to simplify the calculation by starting with the definition of surface charge density and considering the surface area of the ring. Overall, the conversation emphasizes verifying calculations and exploring alternative methods for solving the problem.
doktorwho
Messages
181
Reaction score
6
1. Homework Statement
A flat ring, with radii ##b>a## like on the picture is charged with a surface charge density ##ρ_s=ρ_0\frac{b}{r}## where ##ρ_0=const.## Calculate the potential of the ring on the ##z-axis## by taking the reference point to be in the infinity. Picture below.
2. Homework Equations

Since the reference point is in the infinty the expression for the potential is $$dV=\frac{dQ}{4πε_0r}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I have some ideas and have tried to solve the problem but need the confirmation if this is correct or not.
It goes like this.
1) First i calculated the expression for the total charge on the ring: note: (##ρ_l## is the linear charge density on one circle of the ring)
##ρ_l=ρ_sdA=ρ_s*rdθ=ρ_s2rπ##
##dQ=ρ_s2rπdr##
2)Then i wrote the expression for the potential: note: ( ##R## is the distance to some point on the ##z-axis##
##dV=\frac{dQ}{4πε_0R}##
##V=\int_{a}^{b}\frac{ρ_srdr}{2ε_0\sqrt{z^2+r^2}}##
What do you think about this? Is it correct? Is there an easier way?[/B]
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 469
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems correct to me the final expression for V, cause it is in agreement with what I get if I solve Poisson's equation for the given charge density.

Not sure what you doing when you trying to calculate linear charge density but the expression for dQ seems correct to me also.
 
  • Like
Likes doktorwho
Try starting with the definition of surface charge density:

ρ_{s} dS = dQ

Where S is surface area. You can rewrite:

r = \frac{1}{2} (b + a)

And since the surface area of the ring is simply the difference between the area of the disk defined by b and the disk defined by a, you can quickly obtain an expression for the surface area of the ring. Then, simplifying the result should yield the correct expression for V.

Hope this helps!

- Strelkov
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top