Calculating the probability of finding an electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of finding a 1s electron within a specific radius using the provided probability density function. Participants explore integrating the function over defined limits to find the probability within a sphere of radius a_o. One user successfully transforms the variable for easier integration and applies integration by parts, ultimately arriving at a numerical result. Concerns arise regarding the validity of an 11-digit probability result, as it should not exceed 1 due to normalization. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying solutions independently rather than relying solely on external sources.
baldywaldy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The probability of finding a 1s electron in a region between r and r+dr is:

probability = (4/a^3_o) r^2 e^{-2r/a_o} dr

1. work out the probability that an electron would be found in a sphere of radius a_o

Homework Equations



I know to find the probabilty you work out \int|\psi|^2 dr but because the probability is already given what do i do?

The probability is given in a region between r and r+dr so i guess I somehow work it out over 360 degress?


Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have been provided with the probability density function - you need the probability between some limits... how would you normally do that? Think back to probability and statistics work you did in math class.
 
Simon Bridge said:
You have been provided with the probability density function - you need the probability between some limits... how would you normally do that? Think back to probability and statistics work you did in math class.

are the limits ao and 0 and then intergrate by parts?

Okay so if what i said is true:

I changed the variable to make it more straight forward (x=r/ao) so
(upper limit is 1 lower is 0)

probability = (4/a_o) x^2 e^{-2} dx
Then using intergration by parts I get

(4/a_o) \int x^2 e^{-2x} dx =
= 4/a_o [ (-(1/2)x^2 e^{-2x} - \int (-1/2)2x e^{-2x} dx) ]
= 4/a_o [(-(1/2)x^2 e^{-2x} - (1/2) x e^{-2x} - \int -(1/2) e^{-2x} dx)]
=4/a_o [(-(1/2)x^2 e^{-2x} - (1/2) x e^{-2x} - (1/4) e^{-2x} )]

so substituting in the upper and lower limits (1 and 0) i get

=(1/a_o) -(5e^{-2}/a_o)

If someone could check this for me or tell me where I have gone wrong. The problem i find is that the probability is a 11 digit number
 
Last edited:
I can help you check your own solutions.
Why is an 11 digit answer a problem?
 
Simon Bridge said:
I can help you check your own solutions.
Why is an 11 digit answer a problem?

Because the wavefunction is normalized it should be a maximum of 1 :). I've solved it now anyway, this website helped confirm my answer if anyone has a similar problem

Code:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydrng.html#c1
 
Cool, well done.

Just some general notes:

You should be getting used to reasoning out your answers rather than relying on some outside authority. That's why I was being cautious about saying "yep - that's how you do it". How do you know I'm right? How do you know that website is right - maybe someone made a mistake?

Scientists can come across as very arrogant but one of the humilities in science is this distrust of argument by authority. A Nobel-Prize-winner can be challenged on the same grounds as anyone else.

0.12345678901 is an 11 digit number less than 1. See why I asked why an 11 digit answer was a problem?

You can make hyperlinks by putting the urls in tags. If you just paste the link i...phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydrng.html#c1

But you can also manually type them in for tidier links like this.
(Assuming you are using the quick reply box.)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...
Back
Top