Calculating the Recoil Energy of 57Co Emitting a 14.4 keV Gamma Ray

AI Thread Summary
The recoil energy of a 57Co nucleus emitting a 14.4 keV gamma ray can be calculated using the formula E_recoil = (E_gamma)^2/2mc^2. The energy of the gamma ray is 14.4 keV, equivalent to 1.44 x 10^-5 joules, and the mass of the 57Co nucleus is about 9.474 x 10^-26 kg. Substituting these values into the equation yields a recoil energy of 2.592 x 10^-19 joules. When converted to electron volts, this results in approximately 1.616 eV. Thus, the recoil energy of the nucleus is around 1.616 eV.
dranger35
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What is the recoil energy (in eV) of a 57Co nucleus
emitting a 14.4 keV gamma ray?

If anyone knows the equation that I can use, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the energy of the photon is small (i think it's not \gamma,are u sure it's not MeV...?),you can use the nonrelativistic formula for KE...

For a nice use of the total momentum conservation law ,assume the nucleus to be initially at rest.

Daniel.
 


The recoil energy of a nucleus can be calculated using the equation E_recoil = (E_gamma)^2/2mc^2, where E_gamma is the energy of the gamma ray and m is the mass of the nucleus. In this case, the energy of the gamma ray is given as 14.4 keV, which is equivalent to 1.44 x 10^-5 joules.

The mass of a 57Co nucleus is approximately 9.474 x 10^-26 kg. Plugging in these values into the equation, we get E_recoil = (1.44 x 10^-5)^2/2(9.474 x 10^-26)(3 x 10^8)^2 = 2.592 x 10^-19 joules.

Converting this to electron volts (eV), we have 2.592 x 10^-19 joules x (6.24 x 10^18 eV/joule) = 1.616 eV. Therefore, the recoil energy of a 57Co nucleus emitting a 14.4 keV gamma ray is approximately 1.616 eV.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top